Oncofusion

start / graph / gene-fanci

Proteinmoderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.Q-fa-replication

FANCI — ID2 module; rank 15 of 8,269 for KMT2A-selective dependency, and no KMT2A literature at all

also called FANCI · KIAA1794 · Q9NVI1

FANCI is part of a cellular repair crew that fixes DNA when the copying machinery gets stuck. A screen run by this project found that leukaemia cells carrying the KMT2A fusion need it more than other leukaemia cells do — and nobody has ever published a paper on this gene in KMT2A leukaemia, so the finding is genuinely new and genuinely unconfirmed.

The same thing, for a scientist

FANCI (UniProt Q9NVI1, 1328 aa, primary gene name asserted against the accession) sits in the ID2 module — the FANCD2 partner, and the substrate of the core complex rather than part of it. It entered this graph through a DepMap sweep in which the 26-gene FA/BRCA annotation beats a permutation null at p = 5e-05, FANCI ranking 15 of 8,269 by raw effect (d = -0.312) [E2]. Re-testing here: the depletion is present in BOTH lineage halves (-0.3154 myeloid, -0.4399 lymphoid) and stronger in the lymphoid one; it survives a line-label permutation that preserves subunit correlations (p = 0.0026); and FANCI is not pan-essential (mean Chronos -0.2994 across all screened lines) [E3][E4]. Three things cut against it. Non-KMT2A B-ALL lines show about half the same effect, so a large part of this is B-lymphoid lineage rather than KMT2A rearrangement [E3]. The obligate FA core subunits do NOT move together, which is hard to reconcile with a canonical pathway dependency. And Fanconi anaemia patients, who have no FA pathway at all, nonetheless develop KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia [E7].

Go deeper
What the protein does, and which part of the pathway it sits in

Module: ID2 module — the FANCD2 partner, and the substrate of the core complex rather than part of it.

UniProt states FANCI promotes FANCD2 monoubiquitination by FANCL and that the FANCI-FANCD2 heterodimer binds and scans double-stranded DNA for damage 1.

Why the module matters for reading the DepMap result: the FA core complex is an obligate multi-subunit ubiquitin ligase whose only well-established job is to monoubiquitinate the FANCD2-FANCI (ID2) heterodimer. If the dependency seen here were the canonical pathway working as a unit, every obligate core subunit and the ID2 substrate should move together. They do not — see mech-fa-core-complex-heterogeneity-kmt2a. That is the single most important caveat on this entry and it is not a small one.

How this gene entered the graph, and the numbers

FANCI was not found in the literature. It was found by a scan, and then by a pathway permutation over a gene set fixed before any result was read 2.

statisticvalue
rank by raw effect, 8,269-gene sweep15
rank by scaled z45
d (Chronos difference), whole index arm-0.312
d, myeloid half-0.3154
d, lymphoid half-0.4399
z, myeloid half-0.876
z, lymphoid half-1.222
pan-cancer Chronos, all screened lines-0.2994
fraction of all lines below -0.516.4%
line-label permutation p0.0026

Two of those rows carry most of the weight. The lineage split 3 is the one the project asked for, and the answer is not the one the myeloid-artefact worry predicted: this gene is depleted MORE in the four B-lineage lines than in the seven myeloid ones. The line-label permutation 3 is the answer to the complex-correlation objection: redrawing which lines are the index arm, with the gene set held fixed and the 7-myeloid/4-lymphoid composition reproduced, preserves every correlation between subunits, and the observed depletion still sits at p = 0.0026.

And FANCI is not pan-essential 4, which is the filter that removed most of the earlier scan's contaminants.

The published literature, and a counted absence

On FANCI in KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia there is nothing. 5 The exact query and the title-checked count are in the evidence item; aliases searched were FANCI, KIAA1794.

On FANCI in leukaemia at all, 15 records. 6

And the counter-direction. Human FA patients develop KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia 7. A cell that has lost the FA pathway entirely can still acquire a KMT2A fusion and expand into a clinical leukaemia, which rules out the strongest reading of the DepMap result — that KMT2A-rearranged cells REQUIRE this pathway — and leaves only the quantitative one.

Facts and figures
uniprotQ9NVI1
length AA1328
uniprot resolutiongene_exact:FANCI AND organism_id:9606 AND reviewed:true; primary gene name read back as FANCI; length 1328 aa checked against the entry
fa moduleID2 module — the FANCD2 partner, and the substrate of the core complex rather than part of it
subnuclear localizationCHROMATIN, damage-induced, as the ID complex with FANCD2 [E_q71_loc1]. No resolvable subnuclear BODY is claimed for FANCI; the foci imaged in this pathway were imaged for FANCD2. [EXPLICIT NEGATIVE] NOT MEASURED IN ANY KMT2A-REARRANGED CELL, and not separable from FANCD2 in any system. UNPUBLISHED rather than not-applicable.
essentiality
{
  "depmap_common_essential": false,
  "chronos_mean": -0.2994,
  "frac_lines_below_minus_0_5": 0.164
}
depmap kmt2a selectivity
{
  "chronos_mean_kmt2a_rearranged": -0.8364,
  "chronos_mean_other_leukaemia": -0.4732,
  "difference": -0.3632,
  "pan_essentiality_all_lines": -0.2994,
  "selectivity_rank": 52,
  "rank_denominator": 17728,
  "provenance": "Joined 2026-09-21 from analyses/depmap-kmt2a-selective-scan-full (generated 2026-09-19T10:12:06Z), the project's own genome-wide scan over 11 KMT2A-rearranged and 43 other leukaemia DepMap lines. NOT re-fetched and NOT independent of that scan: every caveat it carries applies here, including that the KMT2A-rearranged arm is a small number of lines drawn from nine individuals, that the rank denominator is 17,728 genes, and that a difference is not a dependency. Added because only 26 of 308 gene entries carried this number, which made any KMT2A-selectivity question answerable for 8% of the corpus.",
  "how_to_read": "A negative difference means MORE required in KMT2A-rearranged lines than in other leukaemia lines. A rank near 17,728 is ANTI-selective. Neither is evidence of a fusion-driven dependency on its own: check pan_essentiality_all_lines before calling anything selective, and note that a paralogue-redundant gene can score near zero for reasons that have nothing to do with this disease - see ana-the-paralogue-redundancy-excuse-is-not-tested-and-my-proxy-decided-the-answer."
}
literature
{
  "kmt2a_records_raw": 0,
  "kmt2a_records_title_checked": 0,
  "leukaemia_records": 15,
  "aliases_searched": [
    "FANCI",
    "KIAA1794"
  ],
  "kmt2a_query": "(FANCI[tiab] OR KIAA1794[tiab]) AND (KMT2A[tiab] OR MLL[tiab] OR \"mixed-lineage leukemia\"[tiab])",
  "leukaemia_query": "(FANCI[tiab] OR KIAA1794[tiab]) AND (leukemia[tiab] OR leukaemia[tiab])"
}
localization
{
  "subcellular": "NUCLEUS AND CYTOPLASM, both at ECO:0000269 in UniProt Q9NVI1 (fetched 2026-09-21). The cytoplasmic pool is a documented asymmetry with its obligate partner FANCD2 (Q9BXW9), which UniProt annotates as Nucleus only - a difference inside a heterodimer that most text treats as a single object.",
  "subnuclear": "CHROMATIN, damage-induced, as the ID complex with FANCD2 [E_q71_loc1]. No resolvable subnuclear BODY is claimed for FANCI; the foci imaged in this pathway were imaged for FANCD2.",
  "explicit_no": "NOT MEASURED IN ANY KMT2A-REARRANGED CELL, and not separable from FANCD2 in any system. UNPUBLISHED rather than not-applicable.",
  "how_shown": "chromatin fractionation and ubiquitination immunoblot after DNA damage (PMID 17412408); UniProt Q9NVI1 SUBCELLULAR LOCATION comment, fetched 2026-09-21",
  "systems": "human non-haematopoietic cell lines with genotoxin challenge; no KMT2A-rearranged system",
  "shown_for_fusion_localisation": "no",
  "node": "localization-chromatin-bound-versus-soluble-fraction-kmt2a"
}
cell type
{
  "evidence_class_key": "concept-expressed-required-maintains-three-evidence-classes",
  "identifier_note": "FANCI (Q9NVI1, 1328 aa) is NOT FANCD2 (Q9BXW9, 1451 aa). They are paralogues that form the obligate ID2 heterodimer and are the most conflated pair in this beat. 123 aa apart, so the stored accession plus length does discriminate them.",
  "expressed_in": {
    "class": 1,
    "summary": "ubiquitous; a cell-cycle-regulated DNA repair effector, not a lineage factor."
  },
  "required_in": {
    "class": 2,
    "claim": "In FANCONI ANAEMIA PATIENTS, the FA pathway is required in HAEMATOPOIETIC STEM AND PROGENITOR CELLS [E_q71_ct1]. This is a pathway-level requirement pooled across complementation groups, not a FANCI-specific measurement, and FA-I patients are rare.",
    "pmids": [
      "22683204"
    ],
    "system_named_in_the_claim": "human Fanconi anaemia patients and FA/FA-like cells, normal haematopoiesis - no fusion present",
    "nodes": [
      "cell-type-hsc-bone-marrow"
    ]
  },
  "the_selectivity_and_what_it_does_not_show": {
    "claim": "Rank 52 of 17,728 in this project's scan: Chronos -0.8364 in KMT2A-rearranged against -0.4732 in other leukaemias, difference -0.3632, pan-essentiality -0.2994. Genuinely in the selective half, with no floor compression - both arms are far from the -2 floor.",
    "but": "A selective DIFFERENCE is not a fusion mechanism. The only requirement documented in a human being is an HSPC requirement in people with no fusion, and this entry's own literature field records that there is no KMT2A literature on FANCI at all."
  },
  "context": "human FA patients for the requirement; this project's DepMap scan for the selectivity"
}
cell state
{
  "evidence_class_key": "concept-expressed-required-maintains-three-evidence-classes",
  "maintains_state": {
    "class": 3,
    "states": [
      "cell-state-quiescence"
    ],
    "claim": "In FANCONI ANAEMIA patient HSPCs, loss of the FA pathway IMPOSES rather than maintains an arrested state: unresolved replication stress hyperactivates p53 and drives a late p21-dependent G0/G1 arrest, and p53 knockdown rescues it [E_q71_ct1]. The direction matters - this is a state the cell falls into when the gene is lost, not one the gene sustains.",
    "pmids": [
      "22683204"
    ],
    "system_named_in_the_claim": "human Fanconi anaemia patient HSPCs and FA-like cells"
  },
  "declined_vocabulary": "No 'replication stress' or 'interstrand-crosslink repair' state exists in this graph's 51-term cell vocabulary. Recorded as a vocabulary gap rather than approximated, following the precedent Q69 set. CLOSED 2026-09-21 by Q73: cell-state-replication-stress-icl-repair now exists and this entry is edged to it with type `regulates` (a mechanism relation - the gene serves the state; it is not a residency claim). The direction this field records is preserved in that node: FA-pathway loss IMPOSES arrest rather than maintaining it, so an edge to cell-state-quiescence would still be wrong.",
  "confidence": "strong",
  "caveats": "Every cell-type and cell-state claim here comes from FA patients and FA-like cells carrying no fusion oncoprotein. The rank-52 placement is a between-arm difference from this project's own scan and is not independent of it. No KMT2A-rearranged cell has been scored for an FA-pathway state, and this gene has no KMT2A literature at all.",
  "counter_evidence": {
    "note": "Fork protection failing is a state with several upstream routes, so seeing it in a leukaemic cell does not identify this gene as the cause. SETD1A-catalysed H3K4 methylation at replication forks is what enables FANCD2's histone chaperone activity, and depleting SETD1A - which is not an FA gene - produces the same uncontrolled DNA2-dependent resection of stalled forks and the same loss of RAD51 nucleofilament stability.",
    "citation": {
      "title": "Histone Methylation by SETD1A Protects Nascent DNA through the Nucleosome Chaperone Activity of FANCD2.",
      "authors": "Higgs MR, Sato K, Reynolds JJ, Begum S, Bayley R, Goula A, Vernet A, Paquin KL, Skalnik DG, Kobayashi W, Takata M, Howlett NG, Kurumizaka H, Kimura H, Stewart GS",
      "year": 2018,
      "venue": "Mol Cell",
      "pmid": "29937342",
      "doi": "10.1016/j.molcel.2018.05.018",
      "type": "paper"
    }
  }
}
depmap release backfill
{
  "open_targets_dataversion": "26.06",
  "note": "Added by Q71 per brief rule 83; Open Targets dataVersion fetched live 2026-09-21 as year 26 month 06. Scan denominator for this gene: n_all_lines 1208."
}
How this could bite us back
  • The FA pathway is a tumour suppressor pathway. Inhibiting it in a leukaemia patient would be expected to raise, not lower, the mutation rate in surviving cells and in normal haematopoiesis — the exact phenotype Fanconi anaemia patients have.
  • Fanconi anaemia is a bone-marrow-failure syndrome. A systemic inhibitor of this pathway carries a named, well-characterised on-target toxicity in the tissue the disease lives in.
  • Children cured of leukaemia live for decades. A drug that disables interstrand cross-link repair sits badly beside the secondary-malignancy risk that already follows topoisomerase-II-directed therapy for KMT2A-rearranged disease.
  • FANCI has no reported small-molecule ligand, and only UBE2T among the eight carries a catalytic site of the kind ligand discovery usually needs.
  • A quarter-Chronos difference is a narrow therapeutic window even if it is real.
  • FANCI's rank of 52 is the second-best FA score in this graph's scan and there is still no FANCI inhibitor and no FANCI-selective tool. Any near-term attempt would act at the ID2-complex or pathway level, which means it cannot be attributed to FANCI rather than FANCD2 - the same false precision the CK2 subunit case has in this graph.
  • FA-pathway inhibition in a child predicts the Fanconi phenotype: HSPC attrition through a p53/p21 arrest, documented in humans who carry no fusion (PMID 22683204). That is essential-function toxicity in the exact tissue being treated.
Still open
  1. Is FANCI depleted in KMT2A-rearranged cells because of replication stress at transcribed loci, because of endogenous aldehyde damage as the ALDH2 work in AML argues, or for a third reason?
  2. Does FANCI knockout cause measurable fork slowing or R-loop accumulation in a KMT2A-rearranged line, or only loss of viability?
  3. Is the B-lymphoid component of this signal a property of B-ALL biology, or of the nine non-KMT2A B-ALL lines that happen to be in DepMap?
  4. Do primary KMT2A-rearranged blasts or patient-derived xenografts show the same FANCI requirement, or is it a property of decades-passaged lines?
  5. Why does FANCI rank 52 and FANCD2 rank 465 in the same scan if they are an obligate heterodimer? Either the asymmetry is real and mechanistically interesting, or one of the two gene's guides behaves differently in the library, and nobody has checked which.
  6. Can FANCI be placed on chromatin independently of FANCD2 in any system? Every published localisation of FANCI is as the ID complex, so a FANCI-specific subnuclear claim currently has no experiment behind it.
Every source behind this entry (9)
  1. E1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database

    FANCI is UniProt Q9NVI1, 1328 aa, and the accession's PRIMARY gene name reads back as FANCI. UniProt states FANCI promotes FANCD2 monoubiquitination by FANCL and that the FANCI-FANCD2 heterodimer binds and scans double-stranded DNA for damage.

    UniProtKB entry Q9NVI1 · UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot 2026
    What this evidence cannot show

    A database record, not an experiment. The accession was resolved by a gene_exact query and then read back: gene_exact matches SYNONYMS, so the primary gene name and the sequence length were both checked against the entry rather than assumed.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • UniProt function text for the FA core subunits is hedged ('may operate in', 'may be implicated in') and largely predates the structural work on the complex; it should not be read as a precise mechanistic claim. UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot 2026
  2. E2moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.dataset

    In the project's own genome-scale sweep, FANCI ranks 15 of 8,269 by raw effect (d = -0.312) and 45 by the scaled z (-0.87), and the 26-gene FA/BRCA set as a whole beats its permutation null at p = 5e-05 on both statistics.

    Effect-size versus z re-ranking of the genome-scale lineage-consistency sweep, with a permutation test of the Fanconi/FA-BRCA pathway · Oncofusion knowledge graph, analyses/effect-size-vs-z-reranking; DepMap Chronos via Open Targets 2026
    What this evidence cannot show

    DepMap CRISPR gene effect in 11 KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia lines against 43 other leukaemia lines. Eleven immortalised lines, none infant-derived, lineage assigned from DepMap free-text disease strings. A rank is not an effect: d here is a Chronos difference of roughly a quarter to a half, which is real but far from the -0.86 of MEN1.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
  3. E3moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.dataset

    Splitting the index arm, FANCI is depleted in BOTH halves (d = -0.3154 myeloid, -0.4399 lymphoid; z = -0.876 and -1.222), and the LYMPHOID half is the stronger one. A line-label permutation that holds the gene set fixed and redraws the index arm as 7 myeloid + 4 lymphoid leukaemia lines gives p = 0.0026 for FANCI, and p = 0.0002 for the eight-gene headline set.

    What this evidence cannot show

    The lymphoid half is four cell lines. The line-label permutation is the right null for correlated subunits because it preserves every gene-gene correlation, but it cannot tell a KMT2A effect from anything else those eleven particular lines share.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
  4. E4moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.dataset

    FANCI is not pan-essential: mean Chronos across every screened cell line is -0.2994, and only 16.4% of lines fall below -0.5. For contrast ACTB is -0.815 with 72.1%.

    What this evidence cannot show

    Computed from the Open Targets slice of DepMap, which does not state its release version. 'Not pan-essential' is a weaker statement than 'selective': a gene can be non-essential everywhere and still not be selectively required in KMT2A-rearranged cells.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
  5. E5strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.database

    There is no published literature on FANCI in KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia. A PubMed title/abstract search including the retired and alternative symbols FANCI, KIAA1794 against KMT2A, MLL and 'mixed-lineage leukemia' returns 0 records, of which 0 are substantive after title-checking every hit.

    What this evidence cannot show

    A counted absence is only as good as its symbol set, and short or word-like aliases inflate counts rather than shrink them, so every hit was title-checked and the checked number is the one reported. Title/abstract search misses work buried in supplementary tables and in screens that name a pathway rather than a gene.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The pathway is not unstudied even where the gene is: a Hoxa-dependency transcriptome in MLL-rearranged mouse leukaemia returns an FA-pathway-enriched signature, which no gene-symbol query would find. Kettyle LM et al. 2019
  6. E6weak confidence 2 of 5: Preliminary, small, indirect, or not yet peer reviewed.paper

    FANCI in leukaemia more broadly: 15 PubMed records for the symbol and its aliases against leukaemia or leukaemia. Transcriptome comparison of Hoxa-deleted against Hoxa-intact MLL-rearranged mouse leukaemia returned a gene signature enriched for the Fanconi anaemia pathway, an independent and pre-existing link between the HOXA-dependent MLL-rearranged state and this pathway.

    What this evidence cannot show

    Differential EXPRESSION in a Hoxa-deletion model, not a dependency, and not human.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • Pathway enrichment in a transcriptome signature is among the weakest evidence for a functional requirement, and the direction is unstated in the abstract: a signature enriched for FA genes in cells that have LOST Hoxa could mean the dependency runs the other way. Kettyle LM et al. 2019
  7. E7moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper

    Human Fanconi anaemia patients, who are biallelically null for an FA gene, do develop KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia — a documented case of therapy-related AML carrying MLL-CBP t(11;16) arising in a child with Fanconi anaemia after topoisomerase-II-directed chemotherapy for ALL.

    What this evidence cannot show

    A single 2000 case report, and the FA complementation group is not stated in the abstract, so which FA gene was lost is not established from this record. Therapy-related leukaemia in an FA background is also a special case.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • This is the sharpest argument against reading the DepMap signal as an absolute requirement: a KMT2A-rearranged clone arose and expanded in a host with a disabled FA pathway. It does not exclude a quantitative dependency, and the DepMap effect sizes are quantitative, not absolute. Quentin S et al. 2011
  8. E_q71_loc1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper

    In HUMAN cells, FANCI - identified as an ATM/ATR kinase substrate required for resistance to mitomycin C - associates with FANCD2 and, together as the FANCI-FANCD2 (ID) complex, LOCALISES TO CHROMATIN in response to DNA damage; FANCI is itself monoubiquitinated, and ubiquitination of each protein is required to maintain ubiquitin on the other.

    Identification of the FANCI protein, a monoubiquitinated FANCD2 paralog required for DNA repair. · Smogorzewska A, Matsuoka S, Vinciguerra P, McDonald ER, Hurov KE, Luo J, Ballif BA, Gygi SP, Hofmann K, D'Andrea AD, Elledge SJ · Cell 2007
    What this evidence cannot show

    Abstract read in full; full text not read. Human non-haematopoietic cell lines with genotoxin challenge - not leukaemia, not KMT2A-rearranged, not infant B-lineage (brief rule 73). 'Localises to chromatin' is a biochemical fractionation statement about the DAMAGED state; it says nothing about where FANCI sits in an unperturbed nucleus and nothing about a resolvable subnuclear structure. The identifier risk is live: FANCI and FANCD2 are an obligate heterodimer routinely written about as one object.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The chromatin address is not separable from FANCD2's. The founding FANCD2 paper had already shown that DNA-damage-induced monoubiquitination targets FANCD2 to nuclear foci with BRCA1, downstream of a FANCA/FANCC/FANCF/FANCG nuclear core complex. Since ID2 ubiquitination is mutually locking, no published experiment places FANCI on chromatin in the absence of FANCD2, so a FANCI-specific subnuclear claim is not currently supportable. Garcia-Higuera I et al. 2001
  9. E_q71_ct1strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper

    In FANCONI ANAEMIA PATIENTS (all complementation groups pooled) and in human FA or FA-like cells, haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells show a profound defect that is present BEFORE the onset of clinical bone marrow failure; in response to replicative stress and unresolved DNA damage p53 is hyperactivated and triggers a late p21(Cdkn1a)-dependent G0/G1 cell-cycle arrest, and knockdown of p53 rescues the HSPC defect in several in vitro and in vivo models.

    Bone marrow failure in Fanconi anemia is triggered by an exacerbated p53/p21 DNA damage response that impairs hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. · Ceccaldi R, Parmar K, Mouly E, Delord M, Kim JM, Regairaz M, Pla M, Vasquez N, Zhang QS, Pondarre C, Peffault de Latour R, Gluckman E, Cavazzana-Calvo M, Leblanc T, Larghero J, Grompe M, Socié G, D'Andrea AD, Soulier J · Cell Stem Cell 2012
    What this evidence cannot show

    Abstract read in full; full text not read. HUMAN FA patients and FA/FA-like cells in NORMAL haematopoiesis - not leukaemia, not KMT2A-rearranged, not an infant B-lineage measurement (brief rule 73). Critically, this is a PATHWAY-LEVEL result: the abstract pools complementation groups and does not attribute the HSPC defect to any single FA gene, so it is cited here as the cell-type context of the FA pathway and NOT as a measurement on this gene. The rescue is p53 knockdown, which is an epistasis result about the response, not about the lesion.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • This is the strongest single argument that an FA-gene requirement in a haematopoietic cell is a LINEAGE property and not a fusion property. The HSPC defect is measured in Fanconi anaemia patients who carry no fusion oncoprotein at all, and it is driven by a generic p53/p21 response to replication stress rather than by anything specific to KMT2A. Any claim that this gene is required 'because of the fusion' has to explain why a fusion-free human shows the same compartment failing. Ceccaldi R et al. 2012
Connected to