NR1H2 / LXR-beta - the paralogue arm of the menin-LXR contact, present in both species and absent from the paper's conclusion
also called LXRB · LXR-beta · Liver X receptor beta · NR1H2 · NER · UNR · Oxysterols receptor LXR-beta
LXR-beta is the near-twin of LXR-alpha, the cholesterol sensor menin switches off. Menin binds it too - but the paper that showed it never mentions it in its conclusions.
The same thing, for a scientist
NR1H2/LXR-beta (P55055, 460 aa) is the ubiquitously expressed paralogue of LXR-alpha; the two share ligands, the RXR heterodimer partner and most target genes, and differ mainly in tissue distribution (LXR-alpha is liver-, intestine- and macrophage-enriched; LXR-beta is everywhere). IntAct records **two non-spoke MEN1-NR1H2 physical associations, one human (HepG2, SF4a) and one mouse (SF4b)**, both from Cheng et al. 2015 [E1]. **The paper's abstract and title name only LXR-alpha** [E2] - the LXR-beta co-IP lives entirely in supplementary figure 4 and in IntAct's curation of it. That is the whole of the evidence: a paralogue control, in two species, never discussed. Graded **weak** on the interaction and kept because the paralogue arm is the thing that decides whether menin is an LXR-alpha corepressor or an LXR corepressor - a difference with a large tissue consequence, since LXR-beta is expressed in haematopoietic cells where LXR-alpha is not.
Why the paralogue arm is the interesting one for a leukaemia graph
LXR-alpha is enriched in liver, intestine, adipose and macrophage. LXR-beta is ubiquitous, and it is the isoform a lymphoid blast expresses. So if menin represses only LXR-alpha, the whole story is hepatic and this graph can note it and move on. If menin represses LXR generally - which the LXR-beta co-IP is the only evidence for - then the menin-LXR axis exists in the cell type this project is about, and a menin inhibitor is de-repressing a sterol sensor in a blast.
The evidence cannot currently distinguish these. A co-immunoprecipitation in a supplementary figure establishes a contact, not a functional consequence, and no LXR-beta reporter or target-gene arm is reported 12.
The identity check, which is worth doing here
LXR-alpha (Q13133, 447 aa) and LXR-beta (P55055, 460 aa) are thirteen residues apart, closer than the SMC1A/SMC3 limit of sixteen that brief rule 66 names as the edge of the length discriminator. Their protein names differ by one Greek letter, and the literature usually writes LXR for the pair. A swap between them is therefore undetectable by verify-accessions.py and invisible on reading the protein name back.
The only safe discriminators are the primary gene symbol (NR1H3 vs NR1H2) and the accession. Both are asserted in data on this entry and on gene-nr1h3 for exactly that reason, and a symbol-collisions row is proposed in this beat's memo.
| uniprot | P55055 |
|---|---|
| length AA | 460 |
| gene symbol | NR1H2 |
| protein name | Oxysterols receptor LXR-beta (Liver X receptor beta, Nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group H member 2) |
| uniprot resolution | accession:P55055, reviewed human, one record; primary gene name read back as NR1H2 (entry NR1H2_HUMAN), synonyms LXRB, NER, UNR; length 460 aa checked against UniProt 2026-09-21. |
| symbol collision check | data/symbol-collisions.json greped 2026-09-21 for NR1H2, LXRB and LXR: no rows existed. A row is proposed in this beat's memo. |
| bait | MEN1 (O00255); mouse Men1 (O88559) |
| tissue distribution | ubiquitous, including haematopoietic cells - unlike LXR-alpha, which is liver-, intestine-, adipose- and macrophage-enriched. This is the reason the paralogue arm matters for a leukaemia graph. |
| shown for fusion | NO - nobody has looked in any KMT2A fusion, in any lineage. |
| fetched | 2026-09-21 |
| subnuclear localization | PARTIALLY NUCLEOLAR in CFP-chimera fluorescence microscopy with fibrillarin as the nucleolar marker, significantly more so than the LXR-alpha paralogue imaged in the same study; AF-2 mutants are EXCLUDED from the nucleolus and DNA-binding-domain basic-rich mutants are partially excluded (PMID 19356704) [E_q89_nr1h2_loc2]. This is a CFP-fusion overexpression result in a non-haematopoietic setting, never reproduced with endogenous protein, never done in a leukaemic cell, and never done under menin inhibition - which is the measurement this graph would actually want, because menin is a corepressor of the LXR arm. |
| localization shown for fusion | NO - nobody has localised LXR-beta in any KMT2A-rearranged cell, in any lineage, under any fusion. This is kept separate from this entry's existing data.shown_for_fusion, which concerns the MEN1-NR1H2 interaction rather than localisation, exactly as gene-nr1h3 does. |
paralogue
{
"accession": "Q13133",
"symbol": "NR1H3",
"length_aa": 447,
"length_difference_aa": 13,
"discriminator": "primary gene symbol only; length cannot separate them"
}interaction with men1
{
"source_pmid": "25962847",
"source_class": "focused mechanistic study, but this pair is a supplementary paralogue control",
"n_intact_records": 2,
"n_spoke_expanded": 0,
"n_source_publications": 1,
"intact_acs": [
"EBI-11364863",
"EBI-11364867"
],
"species": [
"Homo sapiens (HepG2)",
"Mus musculus"
],
"figures": {
"SF4a": "human HepG2",
"SF4b": "mouse"
},
"functional_arm_reported": false,
"discussed_in_abstract": false,
"brief_stated_record_count": 1,
"rest_record_count": 2,
"shared_pdb_entries": []
}localization
{
"subcellular": "NUCLEUS - and in UniProt that is a SEQUENCE PREDICTION AND NOTHING ELSE. P55055 fetched 2026-09-21 carries exactly one SUBCELLULAR LOCATION value, 'Nucleus', on a single support: ECO:0000255 PROSITE-ProRule PRU00407, the nuclear-receptor DNA-binding-domain profile rule. There is NO ECO:0000269 experimental attribution, no ECO:0000250 orthologue inference, and no cytoplasmic value at all [E_q89_nr1h2_loc1]. The human experiment that does exist is not in UniProt: CFP-LXR-beta chimeras are nuclear and partially nucleolar by fluorescence microscopy [E_q89_nr1h2_loc2].",
"subnuclear": "PARTIALLY NUCLEOLAR, AND THE NUCLEOLAR POOL IS GOVERNED BY AF-2. Lall, Kuruvilla and Prüfer expressed CFP-LXR-alpha and wild-type and mutant CFP-LXR-beta and marked the nucleolus with anti-fibrillarin: significantly more CFP-LXR-beta than CFP-LXR-alpha was present in nucleoli; mutations in the basic-rich sequences of the DNA-binding domain caused SOME exclusion of CFP-LXR-beta; and mutations in activation function-2 - the protein-protein interaction surface common to all nuclear receptors - RESULTED IN EXCLUSION from the nucleolus. The authors read this as protein-protein interactions regulating nucleolar sequestration of LXR-beta [E_q89_nr1h2_loc2].",
"how_this_differs_from_the_paralogue_and_why": "Q87 wrote gene-nr1h3 in tranche 2 and recorded LXR-alpha's subnuclear compartment as UNPUBLISHED, correctly refusing to transfer this result to the paralogue, and raised nucleolar exclusion through the conserved AF-2 as a live hypothesis for LXR-alpha. THE TWO ENTRIES NOW LEGITIMATELY DIFFER, and the difference is measured rather than assumed: the same experiment imaged both receptors side by side and found LXR-beta significantly MORE nucleolar than LXR-alpha. So the honest statement is not 'beta is nucleolar, alpha is unknown' but 'beta is more nucleolar than alpha in the one experiment that compared them'. See the correction note in data.correction_owed_to_gene_nr1h3."
}cell type
{
"answer": "UBIQUITOUS, and that is the point of the paralogue pair. UniProt records NR1H2 tissue specificity as 'Ubiquitous' in one word [E_q89_nr1h2_loc1], against NR1H3/LXR-alpha's liver-, intestine- and macrophage-enriched distribution which gene-nr1h3 records from HPA. This entry's own prose already states the distinction; the field records it so the coverage reporter can see it.",
"haematopoietic": "The bounded haematopoietic query returns a real literature - (NR1H2 OR \"LXR-beta\" OR LXRbeta)[tiab] with a macrophage/monocyte/lymphocyte/haematopoietic clause returns 98 records on 2026-09-21 - but this beat did not enumerate or title-check it, so no cell-type-specific claim is made from it beyond the ubiquity UniProt records. Recording the count and the non-enumeration rather than a number dressed as a finding.",
"leukaemia": "ALMOST NOTHING. (NR1H2 OR LXRB OR \"LXR-beta\" OR LXRbeta)[tiab] AND (leukemia OR leukaemia)[tiab] returns THREE records on 2026-09-21, and all three are about LXR AGONIST PHARMACOLOGY in AML rather than about NR1H2 as a protein: an aptamer-targeted exosome/liposome LXR-agonist nanoparticle (41854184), dendrogenin A plus cytarabine (32610562), and a review of ligand-dependent lethal autophagy (29368971). Titles read; abstracts not read."
}cell state
{
"state": "STEROL/OXYSTEROL-LOADED, as for the paralogue - LXR-beta is ligand-activated by oxysterols, so its active state is a lipid state of the cell rather than a differentiation state. See cell-state-lipid-pufa-dependence for the adjacent metabolic state in this graph.",
"bounded": "No NR1H2 cell-state measurement in any leukaemia or KMT2A-fusion system. The three leukaemia records are agonist-pharmacology papers that do not separate the two receptors.",
"kept_consistent_with": "gene-nr1h3 records the same state for LXR-alpha; the two are deliberately identical here because the ligand is shared and nothing distinguishes them on this dimension."
}correction owed to gene nr1h3
{
"entry": "gene-nr1h3 (data.subnuclear_localization, and the same sentence inside data.localization.subnuclear)",
"current_text": "'UNPUBLISHED for LXR-alpha in any cell type. The one nucleolar result in this receptor family (PMID 19356704) is about LXR-BETA / NR1H2 and must not be attached here.'",
"what_it_should_say": "The refusal to transfer the LXR-beta MUTANT result to LXR-alpha was right and should stand. But 'UNPUBLISHED for LXR-alpha in any cell type' overstates the gap: PMID 19356704 imaged CFP-LXR-alpha alongside CFP-LXR-beta in the same experiment with fibrillarin as the nucleolar marker, and reports that significantly more CFP-LXR-beta than CFP-LXR-alpha was in the nucleoli. That is a measurement of LXR-alpha's nucleolar content - a comparatively LOW one - not an absence of one. Suggested replacement: 'LXR-alpha was imaged in exactly one study, as the comparator arm of an LXR-beta experiment: CFP-LXR-alpha is nuclear with significantly LESS nucleolar signal than CFP-LXR-beta (PMID 19356704). No study has LXR-alpha as its subject, and the AF-2 exclusion result is LXR-beta's.'",
"citation": "PMID 19356704, DOI 10.1016/j.cellbi.2009.01.015. ABSTRACT READ IN FULL, full text not read - the relevant sentence is in the abstract: 'Significantly more CFP-LXRbeta than CFP-LXRalpha in the nucleoli.'",
"severity": "minor - it strengthens rather than overturns the paralogue entry, and the refusal it protects was correct. Reported and not edited, per the standing instruction not to edit files this beat does not own."
}localization bounded absence
{
"date": "2026-09-21",
"tool": "NCBI esearch db=pubmed",
"query": "(NR1H2[tiab] OR \"LXR-beta\"[tiab] OR LXRbeta[tiab] OR LXRB[tiab]) AND (nucleolus[tiab] OR nucleolar[tiab] OR subnuclear[tiab] OR \"nuclear speckles\"[tiab] OR \"nuclear bodies\"[tiab])",
"querytranslation": "(\"NR1H2\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"LXR-beta\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"LXRbeta\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"LXRB\"[Title/Abstract]) AND (\"nucleolus\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"nucleolar\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"subnuclear\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"nuclear speckles\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"nuclear bodies\"[Title/Abstract])",
"count": 2,
"on_topic": 1,
"the_one": "19356704 - the CFP chimera study recorded here. The other hit (39323333) was not on this topic at title level.",
"name_list_searched": [
"NR1H2",
"LXR-beta",
"LXRbeta",
"LXRB"
],
"not_searched": "The unhyphenated 'LXRbeta' and hyphenated 'LXR-beta' were both run because they are different strings; 'NER' and 'UNR', UniProt's other two synonyms, were NOT run - 'UNR' collides with the unrelated CSDE1/UNR and 'NER' is nucleotide excision repair, both recorded in data/symbol-collisions.json for this gene pair.",
"absence_class": "never-measured"
}- LXR-beta is the ubiquitous isoform, so a menin-LXR-beta axis would make an off-tumour effect of menin inhibition possible in every tissue, not only the liver. The evidence for it is two supplementary co-IPs that the source paper does not discuss.
- The thirteen-residue gap between the two LXRs means a paralogue swap in this graph would pass every automated check. If a later entry writes 'LXR' without a gene symbol, it is not a gene claim and should not be recorded as one.
- Writing this entry at 'moderate' because it shares a paper with a better-supported partner would be partner-import at the level of a single publication. It is graded weak on its own record.
- Does menin repress LXR-beta transcriptional activity, or only bind it? The reporter and target-gene arms of the source paper were run on LXR-alpha; the LXR-beta arm is a co-IP and nothing else.
- Is menin bound to LXR-beta in a lymphoid blast? LXR-beta is the isoform a blast expresses, so this is the only version of the menin-LXR question that could matter in this disease, and it has never been asked.
- Do the two LXRs use the same menin surface? If they do, a single competition experiment answers both; if they do not, the pharmacology could separate them.
- Menin is a corepressor of the LXR arm and LXR-beta has an AF-2-dependent nucleolar pool. Does menin inhibition move LXR-beta out of the nucleolus? Nobody has imaged either protein under revumenib or ziftomenib, and this graph separately records that menin itself has no subnuclear compartment measurement at all.
- Is the alpha-versus-beta nucleolar difference reproducible with endogenous protein, or is it a property of CFP chimeras? Seventeen years on, PMID 19356704 remains the only subnuclear measurement of either receptor.
- The 98-record haematopoietic LXR-beta literature was counted and not enumerated by this beat. Does any of it contain a compartment measurement in a myeloid or lymphoid cell?
- E1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database
IntAct's REST record holds two MEN1-NR1H2 rows, both typed MI:0915 physical association, neither spoke-expanded: EBI-11364863 in human HepG2 annotated to supplementary figure 4a, and EBI-11364867 in mouse annotated to supplementary figure 4b, both from PMID 25962847.
IntAct REST findInteractions/25962847 (Cheng et al. 2015), 12 records, figure-legend annotated, fetched 2026-09-21 · EMBL-EBI IntAct 2026What this evidence cannot show
One database on one day, REST endpoint (brief rule 93). Two rows from ONE publication, both in supplementary figures. The dispatch brief recorded one record; the mouse row is curated against mouse accessions and is invisible to a human-accession query.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- Both rows are supplementary co-immunoprecipitations from a single publication whose title, abstract and conclusion concern LXR-alpha only, and no functional arm - reporter, target gene or knockdown - was run on LXR-beta. A binding record with no functional arm in a paper that draws no conclusion from it is the weakest kind of curated partner, and the two-species presentation should not be read as replication. Cheng P et al. 2015
- E2moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper
The source publication's title, abstract and stated conclusion concern LXR-alpha only - 'Menin acts as a novel corepressor of LXRalpha' - and make no claim about LXR-beta; the LXR-beta co-immunoprecipitation appears only in supplementary figure 4 and is not discussed.
Tumor suppressor Menin acts as a corepressor of LXRα to inhibit hepatic lipogenesis. · Cheng P, et al. · FEBS Lett 2015What this evidence cannot show
Abstract read this session; full text is Elsevier and route 5 (DOI resolution) returns HTTP 403, so the blots themselves were not seen and the figure attributions come from IntAct's curator annotations. HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells and mouse liver - no haematopoietic system, no KMT2A fusion, no leukaemia of any kind (brief rule 73). Transient transfection and overexpression throughout. The statement that LXR-beta is absent from the discussion is bounded by the abstract and by IntAct's figure annotation: the full text could not be retrieved (Elsevier, route 5 HTTP 403), so it is possible LXR-beta is discussed in a results paragraph. Recorded as a bounded reading, not a verified absence. NOTE FOR verify-claims.py: this claim asserts an ABSENCE in the abstract - that LXR-beta is not mentioned - so its overlap with the abstract text is low by construction and the low support score is the expected result, not drift. It appeared in the declared-abstract-only calibration band at 0.156 on the 2026-09-21 run and was read back and left as written.
Evidence that argues against this (2)
- The absence held when it was written and no longer describes the field. Cao et al. 2026 (J Clin Invest) make LXR-beta the named partner of a menin mechanism in its own right: in intestinal epithelium menin recruits HDAC1 and interacts with LXR-beta to suppress Ces1g transcription, IEC-specific Men1 deletion protects mice against high-fat-diet obesity, and the menin inhibitor MI-463 recapitulates the deletion in mouse and in a human gut organoid-on-chip. So the paralogue arm this entry grades weak because one 2015 paper declined to discuss it now has an independent in-vivo and pharmacological mechanism attached to it, and reading 'not discussed in the source' as 'not established' would be wrong today. Cao X et al. 2026
- The location half of this claim is not the paper's statement, it is a curator's string. Re-read at the endpoint on 2026-09-21, the two MEN1-NR1H2 rows carry the free-text annotations 'figure legend (sf4a)' (EBI-11364863, human) and 'figure legend (sf4b)' (EBI-11364867, mouse) and nothing else; IntAct MI scores 0.4 on both. With the full text unreachable, a mis-transcribed panel label in that field would propagate into this claim and nothing in the entry could detect it. The abstract bounds what the paper CONCLUDES; it does not bound which figure a blot is in. EMBL-EBI IntAct 2026
- E3established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database
NR1H2 (P55055, 460 aa) and NR1H3 (Q13133, 447 aa) differ by thirteen residues, closer than the sixteen-residue SMC1A/SMC3 case this project names as the limit of the length discriminator, so verify-accessions.py cannot catch a swap between them and only the primary gene symbol separates them.
UniProtKB P55055 (NR1H2_HUMAN) and Q13133 (NR1H3_HUMAN), lengths and primary gene names fetched 2026-09-21 · UniProtKB 2026What this evidence cannot show
A measurement about identifiers, not about biology. It does not imply an error exists in this graph - it states that one would be undetectable by the automated check, which is why both entries assert accession and length.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The 13-residue gap is a statement about the automated check, not about the literature. In practice the larger hazard is that most papers and most of this graph's own prose write 'LXR' with no gene at all, which is a pathway claim rather than a gene claim and should not be resolved to either accession - the same shape as this project's rule about RAS-family papers that say 'RAS mutation' without a gene. UniProtKB 2026
- E_q89_nr1h2_loc1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database
UniProt P55055 (NR1H2_HUMAN, primary gene NR1H2, 460 aa, read back 2026-09-21) carries exactly ONE subcellular location value, 'Nucleus', and its only support is ECO:0000255 PROSITE-ProRule PRU00407 - the nuclear-receptor DNA-binding-domain profile rule, a prediction from sequence. There is no experimental (ECO:0000269) attribution and no by-similarity (ECO:0000250) attribution of any kind. Tissue specificity is recorded in one word: 'Ubiquitous'.
UniProtKB P55055 (NR1H2_HUMAN) SUBCELLULAR LOCATION and TISSUE SPECIFICITY comments, fetched 2026-09-21 · UniProt Consortium · UniProtKB 2026What this evidence cannot show
This is a statement about the DATABASE, not about the protein: it establishes that UniProt has no experimental localisation for human LXR-beta, not that none exists. One does exist and is recorded as E_q89_nr1h2_loc2; UniProt does not cite it. Same shape as rule 91's MEN1 case, where the founding localisation paper is absent from the record.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- It would be wrong to treat a PROSITE-rule nuclear call as weak evidence that LXR-beta is nuclear, and equally wrong to treat it as strong. The argument for taking it seriously is that PRU00407 is not a generic prediction - it fires on the C4-type zinc-finger DNA-binding domain that defines the nuclear-receptor superfamily, and a receptor that binds DNA response elements must reach DNA. The argument against is that the same rule fires identically on NR1H3, on every other family member, and on receptors with substantial documented cytoplasmic pools such as the unliganded glucocorticoid receptor - so it cannot distinguish a constitutively nuclear receptor from a ligand-shuttled one, which is exactly the distinction that matters for an oxysterol sensor. The prediction constrains almost nothing about the resting distribution, and the graph should not let a PROSITE rule stand where the paralogue entry was careful to flag the equivalent problem. UniProt Consortium 2026
- E_q89_nr1h2_loc2moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper
LXR-beta has a measured SUBNUCLEAR distribution and it is nucleolar. Using cells expressing CFP chimeras of LXR-alpha and of wild-type and mutant LXR-beta, with the nucleolus marked by anti-fibrillarin antibody, significantly more CFP-LXR-beta than CFP-LXR-alpha was present in the nucleoli; mutations in basic-rich sequences of the DNA-binding domain caused some exclusion of CFP-LXR-beta from the nucleolus; and mutations in ACTIVATION FUNCTION-2, the protein-protein interaction site shared by all nuclear receptors, resulted in exclusion of CFP-LXR-beta from the nucleolus. The authors conclude that protein-protein interactions regulate nucleolar sequestration of LXR-beta.
Liver X receptor beta with mutations in the activation function-2 region is excluded from the nucleolus. · Lall R, Kuruvilla S, Prüfer K · Cell Biol Int 2009What this evidence cannot show
CFP-FUSION OVEREXPRESSION, not endogenous protein; the abstract does not name the cell line and this beat did not obtain the full text, so the system is unstated (rule 73 - the claim above therefore says 'cells expressing CFP chimeras' rather than naming a system). No haematopoietic cell, no leukaemia, no KMT2A fusion, no menin manipulation. Nucleolar residence of an overexpressed basic-rich nuclear protein is a known artefact class, and the study's own controls are mutants of the same construct rather than an endogenous comparison. Graded moderate for that reason, not because the observation is doubted. Abstract read in full; identifiers copied from the efetch record.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The serious objection is that this could be measuring charge, not biology. Nucleoli concentrate highly basic overexpressed proteins non-specifically, and the paper's own DNA-binding-domain result - that mutating BASIC-RICH sequences reduces nucleolar signal - is exactly what the artefact hypothesis predicts, so that arm of the experiment argues AGAINST the specific-sequestration reading rather than for it. What the artefact hypothesis does NOT predict is the AF-2 result: activation function-2 is a hydrophobic coactivator-binding groove, not a basic patch, and mutating it should not change a charge-driven partition. Nor does it predict the reproducible alpha-versus-beta difference between two receptors of near-identical length and charge class. So the AF-2 and paralogue-comparison arms survive the objection and the DNA-binding-domain arm does not, which is why this entry states the nucleolar pool as AF-2-governed rather than as a bulk property. An endogenous LXR-beta immunofluorescence with a fibrillarin co-stain would settle it and has not been done in the seventeen years since. UniProt Consortium 2026
the second LXR receptor already in this graph; the ABCA1/ABCG1 discordance is the cleanest off-target signal either dataset offers
2 non-spoke co-IP rows, human and mouse, supplementary figure 4 only
the paralogue arm; the one that would put the axis in a haematopoietic cell
paralogues, 13 residues apart; length cannot discriminate them (brief rule 66 shape)
LXR-beta, the isoform a blast expresses - the weakest arm
measured 2026-09-21: IntAct REST returns 75 records for P55055 where PSICQUIC id:P55055 returns 29 (39%), so this entry's record count is a property of the endpoint and is not comparable across partners
LXR-beta, graded weak here because one 2015 paper never discussed it, is the receptor a 2026 menin-inhibitor study puts at the centre of an in-vivo intestinal lipid mechanism with MI-463 (PMID 42579365)
- related to →The nucleolus — the one compartment with direct published images of a KMT2A fusion inside it
LXR-beta carries an AF-2-governed NUCLEOLAR pool in CFP-chimera imaging with fibrillarin (PMID 19356704), significantly larger than LXR-alpha's in the same experiment; never tested under menin inhibition (Q89 2026-09-21)
Paralogue pair, and the subnuclear dimension is where they DIFFER by measurement rather than by assumption: one study imaged both and found LXR-beta significantly more nucleolar than LXR-alpha (PMID 19356704) (Q89 2026-09-21)
LXR-beta is an oxysterol-activated receptor, so its active state is a lipid state of the cell rather than a differentiation state - recorded identically to gene-nr1h3 because nothing distinguishes them here (Q89 2026-09-21)