Oncofusion

start / graph / gene-kansl1

Proteinmoderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.Q5-interactome5

KANSL1 - the NSL scaffold, and the protein through which WDR5 binding to NSL and to MLL/COMPASS is mutually exclusive

also called KANSL1 · KIAA1267 · NSL1 · MSL1v1 · CENP-36 · KAT8 regulatory NSL complex subunit 1

KANSL1 is the backbone of the NSL complex, which uses the enzyme MOF to acetylate histones. It matters here for a specific reason: KANSL1 and the KMT2A complex both need the same shared part, WDR5, and a structural study showed they cannot hold it at the same time - so the two complexes compete for a component the leukaemia complex needs.

The same thing, for a scientist

KANSL1 (Q7Z3B3, 1,105 aa) is the scaffold subunit of the **NSL (non-specific lethal) complex**, a nine-subunit KAT8/MOF-containing acetyltransferase that shares **WDR5 and HCF1 with the MLL/SET family** and MCRS1 with INO80 [E1]. KANSL1 interacts directly with four other subunits and recruits WDR5 through a conserved linear motif; the structure of the KANSL1/WDR5/KANSL2 subcomplex shows **the interactions of WDR5 with the MOF-containing NSL complex and with MLL/COMPASS methyltransferase complexes are mutually exclusive**, leading the authors to propose that WDR5 is not a shared subunit but a component that assembles distinct, competing complexes [E2]. That statement matters in this graph, which carries WDR5 as the WRAD hub, `subtraction-kmt2a-win-wrad-interface` as a target dossier and `ana-wrad-subunit-discrimination` as an analysis. **Two published results put NSL in the leukaemia frame.** First, NSL and MLL1 are functionally coupled: depletion of the NSL subunits hMOF or NSL1/KANSL1 reduces both H4K16ac and H3K4me2 at a shared target promoter, while depletion of the MLL/SET core subunit RBBP5 reduces only H3K4me2 - placing NSL **upstream** of MLL/SET [E3]. Second, five NUP98 fusion proteins containing no KMT2A - NUP98-HOXA9, NUP98-HOXD13, NUP98-NSD1, NUP98-PHF23 and NUP98-TOP1 - **physically interact with MLL1 and with the NSL complex**, NUP98-HOXA9 and MLL1 co-localise at HOX promoters, and **MLL1 is required for the proliferation of NUP98-HOXA9 cells in vitro and in vivo** [E4]. KANSL1 itself is not a KMT2A-rearranged dependency: pan-essentiality -0.7402, difference **+0.0685, rank 15,913 of 17,728**, and no requirement in either lineage half (myeloid raw -0.688, z +0.16; B-lineage raw -0.624, z +0.36) [E5][E6].

What it looks like
KAT8 regulatory NSL complex subunit 11,105 aa
Coiled coil · residues 283–314KAT8 HAT-activation region · residues 850–882PEHEPEHE · residues 884–1035KAT8 HAT-domain interaction region · residues 910–92802004006008001,000
loading AF-Q7Z3B3-F1…
AlphaFold AF-Q7Z3B3-F1 ↗
colourshape

This is a prediction, not a measurement. No one has seen this protein in this shape. The colours say how much the software trusts itself, and that is worth reading before anything else — the orange stretches are places the model is effectively saying this part has no fixed shape.

very high (90+)confident (70–90)low (50–70)very low (<50)
I have never read one of these pictures before

A protein is one long chain of amino acids that folds up. The ribbon traces that chain from one end to the other; it is not a wire, it is a simplification of where the backbone runs. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.

Domains are the stretches of chain that do a particular job, and they are what the coloured blocks above the picture mark out. Click one and the view flies to it. In this project the important question about any domain is usually whether the fusion still has it — the labels say lost where it does not.

Anything in yellow sticks is a bound small molecule, which is usually the drug.

Go deeper
The WDR5 exclusivity result, and why it is the most load-bearing thing in this entry

Dias and colleagues solved the KANSL1/WDR5/KANSL2 subcomplex and showed WDR5 is recruited into NSL via conserved linear motifs of KANSL1 and KANSL2. Structure-based KANSL1 mutants in transgenic flies established that the KANSL1-WDR5 interaction is required for proper NSL assembly, for efficient recruitment of NSL to target promoters, and for fly viability. Their conclusion is explicit: 'the interactions of WDR5 with the MOF-containing NSL complex and MLL/COMPASS histone methyltransferase complexes are mutually exclusive', and they propose that WDR5, 'rather than being a shared subunit', assembles distinct histone-modifying complexes with different regulatory roles 2.

This graph's existing position on WDR5 is that it binds the half of KMT2A every fusion throws away - the WIN motif sits in the KMT2A C-terminus, and WDR5 is the single worst-scoring gene in the lineage-controlled selectivity ranking. Nothing here disturbs that. What it adds is a partition statement: the WDR5 pool is divided between NSL and SET1/MLL complexes, and the division is structural rather than a matter of relative affinity alone.

The consequence is a prediction this graph can state and test. If WDR5 is partitioned, then perturbing NSL should change how much WDR5 is available to SET1/MLL complexes, including the retained wild-type KMT2A allele that the fusion's recruitment depends on. That prediction is written up as hyp-wdr5-partition-nsl-versus-compass with an experiment attached, precisely because it is the kind of claim that sounds obvious and has never been measured in a leukaemia cell.

The tension between the two NSL-MLL papers, stated rather than smoothed

The two papers that connect NSL to MLL disagree about WDR5's status and the entry does not hide it.

  • Zhao and colleagues open from the premise that WDR5 and HCF1 are shared subunits of NSL and MLL/SET, and argue from that shared membership to functional crosstalk, concluding that NSL acts upstream of MLL/SET to promote H3K4me2 at certain promoters 3.
  • Dias and colleagues conclude the opposite about the premise: WDR5's NSL and MLL/COMPASS interactions are mutually exclusive, so WDR5 is not shared in the sense of being simultaneously engaged 2.

These are reconcilable - a protein can be a component of two complexes without being in both at once, and crosstalk can operate by competition as easily as by sharing - but the reconciliation is not in either paper. This entry therefore describes NSL and MLL/SET as coupled, and does not describe WDR5 as a shared subunit in its own voice.

The practical reading: a mechanism diagram showing WDR5 simultaneously inside NSL and inside the KMT2A complex would be structurally wrong 2, and the graph should not draw one.

The NUP98 result, which is the cleanest cross-family extension of the MLL1 axis this project holds

Xu and colleagues report that NUP98-HOXA9, NUP98-HOXD13, NUP98-NSD1, NUP98-PHF23 and NUP98-TOP1 - five fusions containing no KMT2A at all - physically interact with MLL1 and with the NSL complex; that NUP98-HOXA9 and MLL1 co-localise on chromatin at HOX gene promoters by ChIP-seq; that MLL1 is required for NUP98-HOXA9 cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo; and that inactivating MLL1 reduces expression of genes bound by both and reverses a gene-expression signature found in NUP98-rearranged human leukaemias 4.

For the menin-interface hypothesis this cuts in a specific direction. It says the MLL1 dependency is not unique to KMT2A-rearranged disease - a second, structurally unrelated fusion family runs through the same wild-type MLL1 complex. That is supportive of the general thesis that the menin-MLL1 module is the druggable node rather than the fusion itself, and it predicts menin-inhibitor sensitivity in NUP98-rearranged leukaemia, which is a checkable clinical claim rather than a mechanistic one.

It is also the reason the NSL subunits needed entries at all: the brief was right that this is the cleanest cross-family extension in the graph, and before this cycle the NSL half of it had no node to attach to.

Limit. The interaction is reported for NUP98 fusions, not for KMT2A::AFF1. Nothing in this paper shows KMT2A::AFF1 binding NSL, and no query run in this beat found such a report.

Cell type, cell state, subcellular and subnuclear localisation, epigenetics

Subcellular: nucleus, plus - unusually for a chromatin scaffold - mitochondrion, kinetochore (KANSL1 carries the alias CENP-36) and spindle pole 7. The non-nuclear annotations are real and are the reason the alias NSL1 is dangerous: NSL1 is also the name of an unrelated kinetochore protein, and one of the four records returned by this beat's KANSL1 query is a Blinkin/kinetochore paper that has nothing to do with the NSL complex 8.

Subnuclear: promoter-proximal. NSL is a promoter-binding complex, and the KANSL1-WDR5 interaction is required for efficient recruitment to target promoters 2. No subnuclear body localisation is reported and none is claimed here.

Cell type: Drosophila (transgenic flies, for the WDR5 mutants) 2; human cell lines for the biochemistry 13; and for the leukaemia frame, murine NUP98-HOXA9 and MLL-AF9 models plus human MLL-AF9 lines 45. No primary patient material and no infant ALL anywhere. Cell state: not established - there is no differentiation-block, quiescence or leukaemia-stem-cell readout for KANSL1 specifically.

Epigenetic readout: KANSL1 has no catalytic activity of its own; it activates KAT8/MOF, and the region required for that activation is mapped to aa 850-882, with the contact to the KAT8 HAT domain at 910-928 7. The mark produced depends on which complex MOF is in: MSL-associated MOF acetylates nucleosomal H4 almost exclusively at K16, whereas NSL-associated MOF has relaxed specificity and also acetylates H4K5 and H4K8 1. That is the single most useful epigenetic fact in this entry, because it means an H4K16ac readout does not report NSL activity cleanly and an H4K5/K8ac readout is the better NSL-specific measurement.

Facts and figures
uniprotQ7Z3B3
gene symbolKANSL1
protein nameKAT8 regulatory NSL complex subunit 1
length AA1105
alphafold IDAF-Q7Z3B3-F1
accession resolutionUniProt REST query gene_exact:KANSL1 AND organism_id:9606 AND reviewed:true, run 2026-09-19; one reviewed hit; primary gene name read back as KANSL1 and length 1105 confirmed from the same fetched record.
alias hazardNSL1 is also the symbol of an unrelated kinetochore protein AND KANSL1 is itself kinetochore-annotated, so the collision cannot be resolved by localisation - title-checking is mandatory on this gene.
complexNSL (non-specific lethal), nine subunits, KAT8/MOF-containing; shares WDR5 and HCF1 with MLL/SET complexes and MCRS1 with INO80
domains noteAll four boundaries are copied from the fetched UniProt feature table; none is estimated. The WDR5-binding conserved linear motif is described in the KANSL1/WDR5/KANSL2 structure but UniProt assigns it no coordinates, so it is deliberately not given a lane.
functionscaffold of the NSL complex; recruits WDR5 through a conserved linear motif and activates KAT8/MOF acetyltransferase activity
classificationNOT a documented interactor of KMT2A::AFF1; a scaffold of a complex that is functionally coupled to MLL1 and that five NUP98 fusions bind
interaction evidence classcrystallography plus Drosophila genetics (WDR5 axis); proteomic purification (composition); co-IP at complex level (NUP98 fusions)
shown for fusionNUP98-HOXA9, NUP98-HOXD13, NUP98-NSD1, NUP98-PHF23, NUP98-TOP1 (at NSL complex level); NOT shown for any KMT2A fusion
cell type evidencetransgenic Drosophila (WDR5 mutants); human cell lines (biochemistry); murine NUP98-HOXA9 and MLL-AF9 models. No primary patient material, no infant ALL.
cell state evidencenot established
epigenetic readoutno intrinsic catalytic activity; activates KAT8/MOF. Complex identity sets the mark: MSL-MOF gives H4K16ac almost exclusively, NSL-MOF has relaxed specificity and also gives H4K5ac and H4K8ac. NSL depletion also lowers H3K4me2 at a shared target promoter.
cell context evidence classmaintains_a_state, in the neuron, at half gene dosage. NOT required_in: KANSL1-haploinsufficient neurons are alive and the people carrying the variant are alive. No haematopoietic evidence class applies.
cell context shown for fusionNO, emphatically, and the pre-existing data.shown_for_fusion on this entry concerns NUP98 fusions at NSL-complex level, which is a different question from cell type and cell state. Nothing in the KANSL1 literature places a cell-type or cell-state phenotype in any KMT2A-rearranged system, and the two KANSL1-against-KMT2A/MLL records found on 2026-09-21 contain no such experiment.
cell context depmapNo requirement and no selectivity, consistent with everything above. KANSL1 is -0.681 in the 11 KMT2A-rearranged lines against -0.749 in 43 other leukaemia lines, difference +0.069 at the 89.76th percentile of 17,728 - the anti-selective half - on a pan-line mean of -0.740. Moderately required everywhere, less so in the index arm. The entry's existing lineage-split analysis already returns 'no requirement in either lineage half'.
domains
Coiled coil283.0Coiled coil: 283KAT8 HAT-activation region850.0KAT8 HAT-activation region: 850PEHE884.0PEHE: 884KAT8 HAT-domain interacti…910.0KAT8 HAT-domain interaction region: 910
enumeration record counts
NUP98 AND ("NSL complex" …1.000NUP98 AND ("NSL complex" OR KANSL1 OR MOF OR KAT8): 1(MLL OR KMT2A) AND KANSL13.000(MLL OR KMT2A) AND KANSL1: 3(MLL OR KMT2A) AND (KANSL…4.000(MLL OR KMT2A) AND (KANSL1 OR KIAA1267 OR MSL1v1 OR NSL1): 4(MLL OR KMT2A) AND ("NSL …4.000(MLL OR KMT2A) AND ("NSL complex" OR "non-specific lethal"): 4("NSL complex" OR KANSL1 …8.000("NSL complex" OR KANSL1 OR KANSL2 OR KANSL3) AND (leukemia OR leukaemia): 8
PDB IDS
[
  "4CY1",
  "4CY2"
]
aliases retired or alternate
[
  "KIAA1267",
  "NSL1",
  "MSL1V1",
  "CENP-36"
]
complex partners
[
  "gene-kat8",
  "gene-wdr5",
  "gene-hcfc1",
  "gene-kansl2",
  "protein-nsl-complex"
]
domains — the numbers behind the chart
[
  {
    "name": "Coiled coil",
    "start": 283,
    "end": 314
  },
  {
    "name": "KAT8 HAT-activation region",
    "start": 850,
    "end": 882
  },
  {
    "name": "PEHE",
    "start": 884,
    "end": 1035
  },
  {
    "name": "KAT8 HAT-domain interaction region",
    "start": 910,
    "end": 928
  }
]
localization
{
  "subcellular": "nucleus; also mitochondrion, kinetochore and spindle pole (UniProt)",
  "subnuclear": "promoter-proximal; NSL recruitment to target promoters requires the KANSL1-WDR5 interaction. No nuclear-body localisation reported."
}
essentiality
{
  "depmap_scan": "analyses/depmap-kmt2a-selective-scan-full",
  "pan_essentiality_all_lines": -0.7402,
  "n_all_lines": 1208,
  "mean_kmt2a_rearranged": -0.681,
  "mean_other_leukemia": -0.7494,
  "kmt2a_selectivity_difference": 0.0685,
  "rank": 15913,
  "n_scanned": 17728,
  "percentile": 89.762,
  "lineage_split": {
    "analysis": "analyses/depmap-interactome5-lineage-split",
    "raw_mean_kmt2a_myeloid": -0.688,
    "z_kmt2a_myeloid": 0.16,
    "raw_mean_kmt2a_b_lineage": -0.624,
    "z_kmt2a_b_lineage": 0.36,
    "z_OCI_AML3": -0.02,
    "z_U937": -1.22,
    "n_kmt2a_myeloid_lines": 6,
    "n_kmt2a_b_lineage_lines": 4,
    "verdict": "no requirement in either lineage half"
  },
  "nsl_panel_ranks": {
    "KANSL2": {
      "difference": 0.2265,
      "rank": 17631
    },
    "KANSL3": {
      "difference": 0.0371,
      "rank": 13630
    },
    "KAT8": {
      "difference": 0.0041,
      "rank": 9683
    },
    "MCRS1": {
      "difference": 0.0139,
      "rank": 10971
    },
    "PHF20": {
      "difference": 0.0339,
      "rank": 13286
    },
    "OGT": {
      "difference": -0.0829,
      "rank": 1634
    }
  },
  "interpretation": "moderately required everywhere with no KMT2A selectivity; a viability screen is the wrong instrument for a complex whose published leukaemia phenotype is in transformation and initiation"
}
enumeration record counts — the numbers behind the chart
[
  {
    "query": "(MLL OR KMT2A) AND (KANSL1 OR KIAA1267 OR MSL1v1 OR NSL1)",
    "records": 4,
    "records_after_title_check": 2
  },
  {
    "query": "(MLL OR KMT2A) AND KANSL1",
    "records": 3
  },
  {
    "query": "(MLL OR KMT2A) AND (\"NSL complex\" OR \"non-specific lethal\")",
    "records": 4,
    "records_after_title_check": 4
  },
  {
    "query": "(\"NSL complex\" OR KANSL1 OR KANSL2 OR KANSL3) AND (leukemia OR leukaemia)",
    "records": 8,
    "records_after_title_check": 1,
    "note": "only the NSL-MLL crosstalk paper is functional; the rest are case reports and mutation landscapes"
  },
  {
    "query": "NUP98 AND (\"NSL complex\" OR KANSL1 OR MOF OR KAT8)",
    "records": 1
  },
  {
    "date": "2026-09-19"
  }
]
cell type
{
  "the_only_documented_cell_type": "The NEURON. KANSL1 haploinsufficiency causes Koolen-de Vries syndrome, and hiPSC-derived neurons from patients show reduced network burst rates and increased variability in burst rhythmicity on microelectrode arrays, impaired mitochondrial function and reduced synaptic density, with the antioxidant phloretin rescuing multiple aspects. In mice, Kansl1 haploinsufficiency impairs autophagosome-lysosome fusion via STX17, causing failed clearance of damaged mitochondria, ROS accumulation and defective neuronal AND cardiac function, reversible with 13-cis retinoic acid.",
  "haematopoietic": "NOT ESTABLISHED for KANSL1 itself, and this is the finding rather than a gap in the search. Measured 2026-09-21: KANSL1[tiab] = 179 records; KANSL1[tiab] AND (KMT2A[tiab] OR MLL[tiab]) = 2; (KANSL1[tiab] OR \"KAT8 regulatory NSL\"[tiab]) AND (hematopoie*[tiab] OR haematopoie*[tiab] OR leukemia[tiab] OR leukaemia[tiab] OR \"bone marrow\"[tiab] OR \"B cell\"[tiab]) = 6, none of which is a KANSL1 cell-type or cell-state experiment in a haematopoietic cell. Zero in titles and abstracts; supporting figures not searched.",
  "complex_level_only_DO_NOT_ATTRIBUTE": "The haematopoietic cell-type biology of the NSL complex belongs to KAT8/MOF, a different subunit. MOF and H4K16ac levels are heterogeneous among HSCs and set their proliferation capacity, with CD93-positive HSCs expanded in Mof heterozygotes in a state the authors call reminiscent of premalignancy; and MOF timing and dosage act as a rheostat on a MOF-RUNX1-GFI1B network for erythroid fate commitment, with Mof haploinsufficiency causing accumulation of a transient HSC population. Neither result is a KANSL1 result and neither may be written onto this entry - this is the error rule 64 exists to prevent, and the graph has committed it before.",
  "nodes": [
    "cell-type-neuron"
  ]
}
cell state
{
  "maintains_state": "Neuronal network activity and mitochondrial quality control, at full gene dosage, in two species. Nothing equivalent is established in any haematopoietic cell state.",
  "previous_field": "The pre-existing data.cell_state_evidence on this entry read 'not established'. That was correct for haematopoiesis and is left standing for that context; what is added here is that a well-documented cell state DOES exist for KANSL1 - it is simply in the wrong tissue for this graph's usual purposes, and it is the toxicity argument rather than the mechanism.",
  "nodes": []
}
depmap kmt2a selectivity
{
  "chronos_mean_kmt2a_rearranged": -0.681,
  "chronos_mean_other_leukaemia": -0.7494,
  "difference": 0.0685,
  "pan_essentiality_all_lines": -0.7402,
  "selectivity_rank": 15913,
  "rank_denominator": 17728,
  "provenance": "Joined 2026-09-21 from analyses/depmap-kmt2a-selective-scan-full (generated 2026-09-19T10:12:06Z), the project's own genome-wide scan over 11 KMT2A-rearranged and 43 other leukaemia DepMap lines. NOT re-fetched and NOT independent of that scan: every caveat it carries applies here, including that the KMT2A-rearranged arm is a small number of lines drawn from nine individuals, that the rank denominator is 17,728 genes, and that a difference is not a dependency. Added because only 26 of 308 gene entries carried this number, which made any KMT2A-selectivity question answerable for 8% of the corpus.",
  "how_to_read": "A negative difference means MORE required in KMT2A-rearranged lines than in other leukaemia lines. A rank near 17,728 is ANTI-selective. Neither is evidence of a fusion-driven dependency on its own: check pan_essentiality_all_lines before calling anything selective, and note that a paralogue-redundant gene can score near zero for reasons that have nothing to do with this disease - see ana-the-paralogue-redundancy-excuse-is-not-tested-and-my-proxy-decided-the-answer."
}
How this could bite us back
  • KANSL1 has no KMT2A selectivity in any DepMap cut run here, and the published MOF requirement spans MLL-AF9 and NUP98-HOXA9 leukaemogenesis alike - so an NSL-directed agent would be a broad myeloid-leukaemia agent, not a KMT2A-selective one.
  • If NSL and MLL/COMPASS compete for a limited WDR5 pool, then inhibiting NSL could RELEASE WDR5 to SET1/MLL complexes, which is the opposite of the desired direction in a disease that depends on a wild-type KMT2A complex. This is a compensation risk that follows directly from the structural result.
  • KANSL1 is annotated to the mitochondrion, kinetochore and spindle pole as well as the nucleus. A degrader would carry mitotic and metabolic liabilities that a chromatin-only mental model would not predict.
  • KANSL1 haploinsufficiency causes Koolen-de Vries syndrome [E9], so constitutive partial loss of this protein has a named human developmental phenotype - a relevant caution for any chronic systemic inhibitor in a paediatric population, though not a direct prediction about transient dosing.
  • ESSENTIAL-FUNCTION TOXICITY — KANSL1 has the clearest human loss-of-function phenotype of any gene in this tranche, and it is bad: roughly half-normal dosage produces Koolen-de Vries syndrome, a named neurodevelopmental disorder. That is a dosage phenotype, so no amount of potency or target selectivity answers it, and the population this graph treats is infants whose brains are still being built. Any KANSL1-lowering strategy has to begin by answering this.
Still open
  1. If WDR5's NSL and MLL/COMPASS interactions are mutually exclusive, does depleting KANSL1 increase WDR5 availability to SET1/MLL complexes in a leukaemia cell, and does that change H3K4me3 at KMT2A::AFF1 target genes? This has never been measured and is the experiment this entry exists to motivate.
  2. Which NSL subunit makes the contact with NUP98 fusion proteins? The published result is at complex level, and the answer determines whether a subunit-selective intervention is even conceivable.
  3. Does KMT2A::AFF1 interact with NSL at all? Five NUP98 fusions do; no query run in this beat found a report either way for a KMT2A fusion, so this is an untested absence rather than a negative result.
  4. Is H4K5/K8 acetylation - the NSL-specific output, as distinct from the MSL-specific H4K16ac - altered at HOXA9 and MEIS1 in KMT2A-rearranged cells? The graph currently reasons about MOF through H4K16ac, which the composition paper says is the wrong mark for NSL.
  5. The mitochondrial-quality-control defect at KANSL1 half-dosage has been shown in neurons in two species. Is it neuron-specific? If it is general, a haematopoietic cell at half dosage should show it too, and the complete absence of any KANSL1 haematopoietic phenotype in the literature becomes a real question rather than a gap in attention. Kansl1+/- mouse marrow already exists.
  6. This graph places KANSL1 in the fusion interactome at NSL-complex level while every cell-type and cell-state fact about KANSL1 is neuronal and every haematopoietic fact about the NSL complex belongs to KAT8. What would it take to show that KANSL1 itself does anything in a blast? A KANSL1-selective degrader with an NSL-integrity readout is the minimum.
Every source behind this entry (11)
  1. E1strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper

    The NSL complex is composed of nine subunits; two of them, WDR5 and HCF1, are shared with members of the MLL/SET family of H3K4 methyltransferase complexes and a third, MCRS1, is shared with the human INO80 remodelling complex. Assembly of MOF into MSL versus NSL controls its substrate specificity: MSL-associated MOF acetylates nucleosomal H4 almost exclusively on K16, whereas NSL-associated MOF has relaxed specificity and also acetylates H4 on K5 and K8.

    Subunit composition and substrate specificity of a MOF-containing histone acetyltransferase distinct from the male-specific lethal (MSL) complex · Cai Y, Jin J, Swanson SK, Cole MD, Choi SH, Florens L, Washburn MP, Conaway JW, Conaway RC · Journal of Biological Chemistry 285(7):4268-72 2010
    What this evidence cannot show

    Abstract fetched from PubMed and read on 2026-09-19; full text not read, every identifier copied from that fetched record. Proteomic purification through multiple candidate subunits in human cells; substrate specificity measured on nucleosomal substrates in vitro, so the in vivo mark distribution may differ. **The paper calls WDR5 and HCF1 'shared', which a later structural study contradicts in the sense of simultaneous engagement (see E2)** - this entry reports the composition from here and does not adopt the word 'shared' in its own voice.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The claim that WDR5 and HCF1 are shared subunits is contradicted as a statement about simultaneous membership by the KANSL1/WDR5/KANSL2 structure, which shows WDR5's NSL and MLL/COMPASS interactions are mutually exclusive. Composition by proteomics cannot distinguish 'present in both complexes' from 'present in both at once'. Dias J et al. 2014
  2. E2strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper

    KANSL1 acts as a scaffold interacting with four other NSL subunits including WDR5, which in turn binds KANSL2; the KANSL1/WDR5/KANSL2 structure shows WDR5 is recruited via conserved linear motifs of KANSL1 and KANSL2; structure-based KANSL1 mutants in transgenic flies show the KANSL1-WDR5 interaction is required for proper NSL assembly, efficient recruitment of NSL to target promoters and fly viability; and the interactions of WDR5 with the MOF-containing NSL complex and with MLL/COMPASS histone methyltransferase complexes are mutually exclusive.

    Structural analysis of the KANSL1/WDR5/KANSL2 complex reveals that WDR5 is required for efficient assembly and chromatin targeting of the NSL complex · Dias J, Van Nguyen N, Georgiev P, Gaub A, Brettschneider J, Cusack S, Kadlec J, Akhtar A · Genes & Development 28(9):929-42 2014
    What this evidence cannot show

    Abstract fetched from PubMed and read on 2026-09-19; full text not read, identifiers copied from that fetched record. Crystallography plus Drosophila genetics; **the in vivo requirement is established in flies, not in mammalian cells, and certainly not in leukaemia**. 'Mutually exclusive' is an inference from the structural overlap of binding sites on WDR5 together with binding data; this entry did not read the competition experiments themselves. The functional consequence for a KMT2A-rearranged cell is a prediction of this graph, not a finding of this paper.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • An earlier proteomic study describes WDR5 and HCF1 as subunits shared between NSL and MLL/SET complexes and reasons from that sharing to functional crosstalk. The two accounts are reconcilable - a protein can belong to two complexes without being in both simultaneously - but the reconciliation appears in neither paper, and any diagram placing WDR5 inside NSL and inside the KMT2A complex at the same time is inconsistent with this structure. Cai Y et al. 2010
  3. E3moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper

    Depletion of the NSL subunits hMOF or NSL1 significantly reduced both H4K16ac and H3K4me2 near the ANKRD2 transcription start site, whereas depletion of RbBP5, a core component of MLL/SET complexes, reduced H3K4me2 only and not H4K16ac - consistent with NSL acting upstream of MLL/SET to regulate H3K4me2 at certain promoters. A set of genes including ANKRD2 was affected by knockdown of both NSL and MLL/SET subunits.

    Crosstalk between NSL histone acetyltransferase and MLL/SET complexes: NSL complex functions in promoting histone H3K4 di-methylation activity by MLL/SET complexes · Zhao X, Su J, Wang F, Liu D, Ding J, Yang Y, Conaway JW, Conaway RC, Cao L, Wu D, Wu M, Cai Y, Jin J · PLoS Genetics 9(11):e1003940 2013
    What this evidence cannot show

    Abstract fetched from PubMed and read on 2026-09-19; full text not read, identifiers copied from that fetched record. **The exemplar locus is ANKRD2, a skeletal-muscle ankyrin-repeat gene, in human cell lines - not a HOXA locus and not a haematopoietic system.** Knockdown rather than acute degradation, so secondary effects are not excluded. The ordering claim (NSL upstream of MLL/SET) rests on an asymmetry in two knockdowns at one promoter, which is suggestive rather than decisive. 'NSL1' in this paper means KANSL1, not the kinetochore protein of the same name.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The generalisability of a single-promoter epistasis result is the obvious weakness, and the same laboratory's earlier composition paper shows NSL and MLL/SET share components whose depletion would perturb both complexes - so 'NSL upstream of MLL/SET' and 'the two complexes compete for a shared limiting component' predict similar knockdown asymmetries and are not distinguished by this experiment. Dias J et al. 2014
  4. E4strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper

    NUP98 fusion proteins including NUP98-HOXA9, NUP98-HOXD13, NUP98-NSD1, NUP98-PHF23 and NUP98-TOP1 physically interact with MLL1 and with the non-specific lethal (NSL) histone-modifying complex; ChIP-seq shows NUP98-HOXA9 and MLL1 co-localise on chromatin at HOX gene promoter regions; MLL1 is required for the proliferation of NUP98-HOXA9 cells in vitro and in vivo; and inactivation of MLL1 decreases expression of genes bound by NUP98-HOXA9 and MLL1 and reverses a gene expression signature found in NUP98-rearranged human leukaemias.

    NUP98 Fusion Proteins Interact with the NSL and MLL1 Complexes to Drive Leukemogenesis · Xu H, Valerio DG, Eisold ME, Sinha A, Koche RP, Hu W, Chen CW, Chu SH, Brien GL, Park CY, Hsieh JJ, Ernst P, Armstrong SA · Cancer Cell 30(6):863-878 2016
    What this evidence cannot show

    Abstract fetched from PubMed and read on 2026-09-19; full text not read, every identifier copied from that fetched record. **The fusions studied contain no KMT2A**; this is evidence that a second fusion family runs through the wild-type MLL1 complex, not evidence about KMT2A::AFF1. Models are murine transformation and xenograft systems plus human NUP98-rearranged expression signatures; no primary paediatric patient material is described in the abstract. 'Physically interact with the NSL complex' is stated at complex level and the abstract does not name which NSL subunit makes the contact.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The complementary result from the same group is that MOF's catalytic activity is required for MLL-AF9 leukaemogenesis AND that Mof inactivation suppresses leukaemia development in an NUP98-HOXA9 model - so the MOF/NSL requirement spans both fusion families. That breadth is exactly what argues against NSL being a KMT2A-specific vulnerability, and it is consistent with KANSL1 showing no KMT2A selectivity in DepMap. Valerio DG et al. 2017
  5. E5moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.database

    In the genome-wide KMT2A-rearranged selectivity scan of 17,728 genes, KANSL1 has a pan-essentiality of -0.7402 across 1,208 lines and a KMT2A-rearranged selectivity difference of +0.0685 (KMT2A-rearranged mean -0.681 against other-leukaemia mean -0.7494), ranking 15,913 (89.762nd percentile). Other NSL-associated genes: KANSL2 +0.2265 rank 17,631; KANSL3 +0.0371 rank 13,630; KAT8 +0.0041 rank 9,683; MCRS1 +0.0139 rank 10,971; PHF20 +0.0339 rank 13,286; OGT -0.0829 rank 1,634.

    Genome-wide KMT2A-rearranged selectivity scan, 17,728 genes (DepMap Chronos via Open Targets) · Broad Institute DepMap / Open Targets Platform; analyses/depmap-kmt2a-selective-scan-full 2026
    What this evidence cannot show

    Rows read out of analyses/depmap-kmt2a-selective-scan-full/results.json on 2026-09-19 in a scripted pass; no number typed from recall. Eleven KMT2A-rearranged against 43 other leukaemia lines, AML-heavy, none infant-derived. KANSL1's pan-essentiality of -0.74 is moderate, so floor compression is less severe here than for FACT, but the difference of +0.0685 is well inside the range where nothing should be concluded.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • Seven of the eight NSL-associated genes fall on the anti-selective side of the median, which would be a striking pattern if the NSL requirement were KMT2A-specific and is exactly what is expected if NSL is general machinery required comparably by all leukaemia lines. The published MOF result - required for MLL-AF9 AND for NUP98-HOXA9 leukaemogenesis - predicts precisely this lack of differential. Valerio DG et al. 2017
  6. E6moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.database

    On the lineage-split run for this beat, KANSL1 shows no KMT2A-rearranged requirement in either lineage half: myeloid raw mean gene effect -0.688 (z +0.16 in other-leukaemia SDs), B-lineage raw mean -0.624 (z +0.36). OCI-AML3 sits at z -0.02 and U-937 at z -1.22. KAT8 in the same run: myeloid z -0.13, B-lineage z +0.24, OCI-AML3 z +1.41.

    Interactome round 5 panel, lineage-split DepMap dependency (FACT, NSL, MSL, COMPASS remainder, Mediator) · Broad Institute DepMap / Open Targets Platform; analyses/depmap-interactome5-lineage-split 2026
    What this evidence cannot show

    Rows read from analyses/depmap-interactome5-lineage-split/results.json on 2026-09-19. Six myeloid and four B-lineage index lines, so a single line moves a mean; the split is by lineage LABEL, not expression signature. The U-937 value of z -1.22 is a single line carrying a PICALM::MLLT10 fusion and is reported for reference only; one-line z values are not dependency claims.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • A viability screen is a poor instrument for NSL specifically, because the published leukaemia result about this complex concerns MOF catalytic activity in transformation and leukaemia initiation in mice rather than proliferation of established human lines - and a catalytic-dead rescue was needed there to make the point. A null z in DepMap does not contradict that result. Valerio DG et al. 2017
  7. E7established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database

    UniProtKB Q7Z3B3 (KANL1_HUMAN, KAT8 regulatory NSL complex subunit 1) is 1,105 aa with synonyms CENP-36, KIAA1267, MSL1V1 and NSL1; it is annotated to nucleus, kinetochore, mitochondrion and spindle pole; and it carries a PEHE domain at 884-1035, a region required for activation of KAT8 histone acetyltransferase activity at 850-882, a region interacting with the KAT8 HAT domain at 910-928, and a coiled coil at 283-314. Two PDB entries exist, 4CY1 and 4CY2.

    UniProtKB Q7Z3B3 (KANL1_HUMAN), KAT8 regulatory NSL complex subunit 1 · UniProt Knowledgebase, reviewed (Swiss-Prot) 2026
    What this evidence cannot show

    Record fetched 2026-09-19 via UniProt REST with gene_exact:KANSL1 AND organism_id:9606 AND reviewed:true; **primary gene name read back as KANSL1 and length 1,105 confirmed from the same fetched record**, per the standing accession rule. One reviewed hit. The mitochondrial and kinetochore annotations are UniProt curation from separate literatures not read for this entry and are reported as annotations rather than asserted as facts about leukaemia cells.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The UniProt synonym NSL1 collides with an unrelated kinetochore gene of the same symbol, and KANSL1 is itself annotated to the kinetochore - which makes this an alias trap that cannot be resolved by localisation and must be resolved by reading titles. One of the four records in this beat's KANSL1 query is exactly that false positive. NCBI PubMed, queried 2026-09-19 2026
  8. E8moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.database

    As of 2026-09-19 PubMed returns 4 records for '(MLL OR KMT2A) AND (KANSL1 OR KIAA1267 OR MSL1v1 OR NSL1)', 3 for '(MLL OR KMT2A) AND KANSL1', 4 for '(MLL OR KMT2A) AND ("NSL complex" OR "non-specific lethal")' and 8 for '("NSL complex" OR KANSL1 OR KANSL2 OR KANSL3) AND (leukemia OR leukaemia)'. Title-checking the 4-record alias query leaves 2 relevant papers - the KANSL1/WDR5/KANSL2 structure and the NSL-MLL/SET crosstalk study; the other two are an IDH1/2-JARID1C-UTX metabolic review and a kinetochore Blinkin interaction-mapping paper matched on the unrelated NSL1 symbol. The 8-record leukaemia query yields no additional functional paper: it returns a KANSL1::ARL17A case report, a KANSL1-MTCP1 fusion case, a relapsed-AML genomics paper, a T-LBL fusion-transcript survey and a Down-syndrome myeloid mutation landscape.

    What this evidence cannot show

    Counts from the esearch `count` field, queried 2026-09-19, with **every record in each counted query title-checked individually**. Symbol set: KANSL1, KIAA1267, MSL1v1, NSL1, KANSL2, KANSL3, plus the phrases 'NSL complex' and 'non-specific lethal'. The alias NSL1 inflates and was the reason title-checking was required. Not searched: 'KAT8 regulatory NSL complex subunit' as a phrase.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The NUP98 paper that provides the strongest leukaemia link for NSL does not appear in the KANSL1 alias query at all - it is found only through the phrase queries - which demonstrates that a subunit-symbol enumeration alone would have reported NSL as having no leukaemia literature and been wrong. Complex-name phrases had to be searched alongside gene symbols. Xu H et al. 2016
  9. E9established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper

    KANSL1 haploinsufficiency causes Koolen-de Vries syndrome, a recognised human developmental disorder with a described adult phenotype.

    Adult phenotype in Koolen-de Vries/KANSL1 haploinsufficiency syndrome · Amenta S, Frangella S, Marangi G, Lattante S, Ricciardi S, Doronzio PN, Orteschi D, Veredice C · Journal of Medical Genetics 59:189-195 2022
    What this evidence cannot show

    Title, journal, volume, pages, year, authors and DOI were read from the PubMed esummary record fetched on 2026-09-19; the abstract and full text were NOT read in this session, so this citation is used only for the existence and name of the syndrome, which its title states. It is cited here for a bite-back argument about systemic inhibition and for nothing mechanistic.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • A germline haploinsufficiency phenotype bounds the tolerability of constitutive 50% loss across development; it does not directly predict the tolerability of transient pharmacological inhibition in an older child, and treating it as if it did would overstate the argument. UniProt Knowledgebase, reviewed (Swiss-Prot) 2026
  10. E10strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper

    The only cell type in which KANSL1 has a documented cell-state phenotype is the neuron: hiPSC-derived neurons from Koolen-de Vries syndrome patients, who carry KANSL1 haploinsufficiency, show reduced network burst rates and increased variability in burst rhythmicity on microelectrode arrays together with impaired mitochondrial function and reduced synaptic density, and the antioxidant phloretin improves the network phenotype, reduces reactive oxygen species and rescues synaptic density across patient lines.

    Integrative transcriptomics and electrophysiological profiling of hiPSC-derived neurons identifies novel druggable pathways in Koolen-de Vries Syndrome. · Verboven AHA, Puvogel S, Latour BL, Kolsters N, Lewerissa EI, Mijdam R, Dyke E, Duineveld D, Zoodsma M, Claassen WJJ, Oudakker A, Schoenmaker C, Koolen DA, de Vries BBA, 't Hoen PAC, Linda K, Nadif Kasri N · Mol Psychiatry 2026
    What this evidence cannot show

    Human iPSC-derived neurons on microelectrode arrays - a reductionist model of a cortical network. The drug nomination is a computational LINCS signature screen with ten candidates triaged. No haematopoietic, leukaemic or KMT2A-rearranged system anywhere in the paper. Read: abstract only. Recorded here as the human loss-of-function phenotype that constrains any KANSL1-lowering strategy, not as leukaemia biology.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • The murine work on the same haploinsufficiency attributes the neuronal defect to failed autophagosome-lysosome fusion through transcriptional control of STX17 and rescues it with 13-cis retinoic acid, not with an antioxidant. Two models of one phenotype, converging on damaged-mitochondria handling and disagreeing on the route, with neither testing the other. Li T et al. 2022
  11. E11moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper

    The haematopoietic cell-type biology of the NSL complex belongs to KAT8/MOF and not to KANSL1, and must not be transferred: MOF and H4K16ac levels are heterogeneous among haematopoietic stem cells and influence their proliferation capacity, with a CD93-positive HSC subpopulation expanded and proliferatively advantaged in Mof heterozygous animals in a state the authors describe as reminiscent of premalignancy, and low MOF with high CD93 correlating with poor survival in leukaemia.

    What this evidence cannot show

    This is a MOF/KAT8 result, NOT a KANSL1 result, and it is recorded on this entry only to mark what the complex-level literature does and does not license. Mouse. Read: abstract only. No KANSL1 perturbation appears in it.

    Evidence that argues against this (1)
    • A second MOF study points at a different cell-fate axis again - MOF timing and dosage acting as a rheostat on a MOF-RUNX1-GFI1B feedforward network for erythroid fate commitment, with Mof haploinsufficiency causing accumulation of a transient HSC population. So even at the level of the correct subunit, MOF's haematopoietic role is described as quiescence-versus-activation in one paper and erythroid fate commitment in another. Borrowing either for KANSL1 would import an unsettled result into the wrong gene. Pessoa Rodrigues C et al. 2020
Connected to