CHUK (IKK-alpha) — the only kinase that sits in BOTH NF-kB arms, which makes it the one subunit whose inhibition has an ambiguous sign in this disease
also called CHUK · IKK-alpha · IKKA · IKK1 · conserved helix-loop-helix ubiquitous kinase · O15111
IKK-alpha is a kinase that works in two different versions of the NF-kB switch at once. One of those versions keeps the leukaemia going and the other one shuts it down, so blocking IKK-alpha does two opposite things in the same cell and nobody has measured which wins.
The same thing, for a scientist
CHUK (UniProt O15111, 745 aa, primary gene name read back) is the alpha catalytic subunit of the IKK complex. Its position is structurally unusual and matters more here than anywhere else in this beat: **IKKa is a member of the canonical IKKa/b/g complex AND the kinase that NIK phosphorylates to drive non-canonical signalling**, where it processes p100 to p52 for RelB:p52 nuclear translocation [E1][E2]. Every other component in this folder belongs to one arm. **Canonical evidence:** Ikka was among the 33 phosphoregulator hits in the MLL-leukaemia screen, and its shRNA knockdown reduced growth and clonogenicity of MLL-transformed progenitors — but explicitly **'to a lesser extent'** than Ikkb [E1]. **Non-canonical evidence:** NIK stabilisation in MLL-AF9 AML raised IKKa phosphorylation, RelB, and p100-to-p52 processing, and the downstream consequence was leukaemia **suppression** [E2]. So the two lines of evidence on this one protein point in opposite therapeutic directions, and an IKKa inhibitor would remove both at once. **Counted absence:** (KMT2A OR MLL OR "mixed-lineage leukemia") AND (CHUK OR IKK-alpha aliases) returns 4 PubMed records, and title-checking removes all four [E3]. There is no CHUK-specific study in this disease. Everything here is inferred from figures inside papers about something else.
This is a prediction, not a measurement. No one has seen this protein in this shape. The colours say how much the software trusts itself, and that is worth reading before anything else — the orange stretches are places the model is effectively saying this part has no fixed shape.
I have never read one of these pictures before
A protein is one long chain of amino acids that folds up. The ribbon traces that chain from one end to the other; it is not a wire, it is a simplification of where the backbone runs. Drag to rotate, scroll to zoom.
Domains are the stretches of chain that do a particular job, and they are what the coloured blocks above the picture mark out. Click one and the view flies to it. In this project the important question about any domain is usually whether the fusion still has it — the labels say lost where it does not.
Anything in yellow sticks is a bound small molecule, which is usually the drug.
Why the two-arm membership is not a footnote
In the canonical arm IKKa is a partner of IKKb in a NEMO-scaffolded complex that degrades IkBa. In the non-canonical arm IKKa acts as a NIK substrate and a p100 kinase, independently of NEMO. The non-canonical arm's output in MLL-AF9 leukaemia is anti-leukaemic — RelB overexpression represses AML, RelA overexpression accelerates it, and RelB knockdown partially reverses NIK's protective effect 2.
The practical consequence: a pan-IKK inhibitor is not a canonical-pathway drug. It inhibits the protective arm's kinase too. The pharmacology in the founding MLL paper used IKK inhibitors III, IV and VII, which are not subunit-selective 1, so the anti-leukaemic effect reported there was measured while both arms were being blocked. That is consistent with canonical dominance in that system and does not establish it.
What would have to be measured to separate them
An Ikka knockdown or a kinase-dead knock-in in the same MLL model, with p100 processing and RelB nuclear localisation as the non-canonical readout and IkBa degradation and RELA nuclear localisation as the canonical readout, plus an MLL-fusion ChIP. None of the three has been done together. The shRNA data that exist report growth only.
| uniprot | O15111 |
|---|---|
| length AA | 745 |
| alphafold ID | AF-O15111-F1 |
| resolution note | gene_exact:CHUK AND organism_id:9606 AND reviewed:true returned 1 reviewed row; gene_primary read back as CHUK; length 745 aa. |
| pathway arm | both canonical and non-canonical |
| subnuclear localization | CHROMATIN AT TRANSCRIBED GENES, TRAVELLING WITH ELONGATING POL II - a genomic and machinery-associated address rather than a nuclear body, and for this project it is the single most interesting subnuclear fact in the tranche. Thorne, Ouboussad and Lefevre showed in ACTIVATED MACROPHAGES that IKK-alpha travels with the ELONGATING form of RNA polymerase II together with HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN 1 GAMMA at NF-kB-dependent genes; IKK-alpha binds and phosphorylates HP1gamma, HP1gamma in turn controls IKK-alpha's chromatin binding, and IKK-alpha phosphorylates the histone variant H3.3 at serine 31 WITHIN TRANSCRIBING REGIONS; downstream of transcription end sites IKK-alpha accumulates with its inhibitor CUEDC2 [E_q93_chuk_loc3]. Upstream of that, at the promoter, IKK-alpha phosphorylates H3 serine 10 and that mark TRIGGERS RECRUITMENT OF BRD4 AND P-TEFb [E_q93_chuk_loc2][E_q93_chuk_loc3]. NO nuclear-body, speckle, nucleolar or PML assignment exists: CHUK against a twelve-term subnuclear clause returns 4 records of which 2 are the HP1 papers and 2 are off topic [E_q93_chuk_loc4]. |
| localization shown for fusion | NO - nobody has localised IKK-alpha in any KMT2A fusion, in any lineage. The gene clause across CHUK, IKKalpha, IKK-alpha and IKK1 against a nine-term fusion clause returns 2 records (PMIDs 36503469 and 30826414) and the gene clause AND a localisation clause AND the fusion clause returns ZERO, against an operand control of 3,045 [E_q93_chuk_loc4]. THE UNASKED QUESTION IS UNUSUALLY WELL-POSED, which is why the absence is worth this much space: IKK-alpha writes H3S10ph at promoters and that mark recruits BRD4 AND P-TEFb, and it then travels with elongating Pol II writing H3.3S31ph through gene bodies. Recruiting P-TEFb to target loci through the SEC is the KMT2A fusion's central mechanism in this graph, and BRD4 and CDK9/CCNT1 are both canonical entries here. So there is a second, independent, kinase-driven route to the same two factors at the same kind of locus, in the same pathway this graph already knows is required to retain fusion MLL on chromatin (gene-rela's existing E_q69_ct1) - and no experiment has ever put IKK-alpha and a KMT2A fusion in the same chromatin readout. |
essentiality
{}depmap kmt2a selectivity
{
"chronos_mean_kmt2a_rearranged": -0.0419,
"chronos_mean_other_leukaemia": -0.019,
"difference": -0.023,
"pan_essentiality_all_lines": -0.1068,
"selectivity_rank": 6183,
"rank_denominator": 17728,
"provenance": "Joined 2026-09-21 from analyses/depmap-kmt2a-selective-scan-full (generated 2026-09-19T10:12:06Z), the project's own genome-wide scan over 11 KMT2A-rearranged and 43 other leukaemia DepMap lines. NOT re-fetched and NOT independent of that scan: every caveat it carries applies here, including that the KMT2A-rearranged arm is a small number of lines drawn from nine individuals, that the rank denominator is 17,728 genes, and that a difference is not a dependency. Added because only 26 of 308 gene entries carried this number, which made any KMT2A-selectivity question answerable for 8% of the corpus.",
"how_to_read": "A negative difference means MORE required in KMT2A-rearranged lines than in other leukaemia lines. A rank near 17,728 is ANTI-selective. Neither is evidence of a fusion-driven dependency on its own: check pan_essentiality_all_lines before calling anything selective, and note that a paralogue-redundant gene can score near zero for reasons that have nothing to do with this disease - see ana-the-paralogue-redundancy-excuse-is-not-tested-and-my-proxy-decided-the-answer."
}localization
{
"CONSTITUTIVE": "CYTOPLASM AND NUCLEUS, SHUTTLING, and this is the BEST-EVIDENCED compartment record of the three NF-kB entries in this graph. UniProt O15111 (fetched live 2026-09-21) carries 'Cytoplasm' (ECO:0000269 PubMed:12789342 and PubMed:30341167) and 'Nucleus' (ECO:0000269 PubMed:12789342), with the note 'Shuttles between the cytoplasm and the nucleus' [E_q93_chuk_loc1].",
"RULE_91_PASSES_AND_THE_CITATION_IS_BETTER_THAN_THE_ANNOTATION": "PubMed:12789342 is Yamamoto, Verma, Prajapati, Kwak and Gaynor, 'Histone H3 phosphorylation by IKK-alpha is critical for cytokine-induced gene expression', Nature 2003 - a paper whose entire subject is that IKK-alpha does something in the nucleus, raised precisely because IKK-alpha-deficient fibroblasts are defective in NF-kB-dependent transcription despite IKK-beta being the cytokine-induced IkappaB kinase [E_q93_chuk_loc2]. So the coded citation is squarely about the fact. What UniProt loses is the PRECISION: the paper's finding is not 'nucleus', it is CHROMATIN AT NF-kB-RESPONSIVE PROMOTERS, with histone H3 serine-10 as the substrate.",
"how_shown": "recruitment of IKK-alpha to NF-kB-responsive promoters with H3 serine-10 phosphorylation as the readout (PMID 12789342); Pol II travelling-complex and chromatin-binding experiments with HP1gamma interdependence in activated macrophages (PMID 22649058); the second cytoplasmic attribution is an innate-immune signalling paper on DDX3 facilitating IKK-alpha activation (PMID 30341167)",
"systems": "mouse embryo fibroblasts and cytokine-stimulated cell lines for the 2003 work; primary/activated MACROPHAGES for the elongation work; no leukaemic cell and no KMT2A-rearranged cell",
"node": "localization-transcription-factories-pol2-clusters"
}cell type
{
"expressed_in": "UniProt O15111 tissue specificity: 'Widely expressed' - no lineage information.",
"measured_in": "mouse embryo fibroblasts and cytokine-stimulated lines (2003); ACTIVATED MACROPHAGES for the elongation and HP1gamma work (2012). The macrophage system is myeloid, which is worth naming because it is the only haematopoietic cell in which IKK-alpha's chromatin position has been measured.",
"in_this_disease": "This entry's existing content is the cell-type record: Ikka was among the 33 phosphoregulator hits in the MLL-leukaemia screen and its shRNA knockdown reduced growth. That is a dependency result in MLL-rearranged cells with NO localisation attached, and the system there is murine/myeloid MLL leukaemia rather than infant B-lineage KMT2A::AFF1.",
"the_gap": "Nobody has measured IKK-alpha chromatin occupancy, or its HP1gamma or CUEDC2 association, in any KMT2A-rearranged cell of either lineage."
}cell state
{
"state": "STIMULUS-ACTIVATED, and the compartment is part of the switch rather than a backdrop. The nuclear function is cytokine-induced - it was discovered because IKK-alpha-deficient cells fail NF-kB-dependent transcription - and the chromatin-travelling behaviour was measured in ACTIVATED macrophages [E_q93_chuk_loc2][E_q93_chuk_loc3].",
"and_a_second_state_variable_that_is_positional": "IKK-alpha's association with its inhibitor CUEDC2 happens DOWNSTREAM OF TRANSCRIPTION END SITES, which the authors read as a link between IKK-alpha inactivation and transcription termination [E_q93_chuk_loc3]. So the kinase's activity state and its position along a gene are coupled - active at the promoter and through the body, inhibited past the end. That is a state variable with a coordinate, which is rare in this graph.",
"bounded": "No IKK-alpha localisation or chromatin-position measurement exists in any leukaemic cell, and nothing under a menin inhibitor."
}localization bounded absence
{
"date": "2026-09-21",
"tool": "NCBI E-utilities esearch, db=pubmed",
"run_by": "Q93",
"queries": [
{
"query": "(\"CHUK\"[tiab] OR \"IKKalpha\"[tiab] OR \"IKK-alpha\"[tiab] OR \"IKK1\"[tiab])",
"querytranslation": "\"CHUK\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"IKKalpha\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"IKK-alpha\"[Title/Abstract] OR \"IKK1\"[Title/Abstract]",
"count": 3045,
"role": "operand control"
},
{
"query": "(gene clause) AND (twelve-term subnuclear clause)",
"count": 4,
"title_check": "2 on topic and both cited here: PMID 22649058 (HP1gamma and IKK-alpha interdependence during TNF transcription elongation) and PMID 27367027 (IKK subunits and liver cancer stem cells via an HP1-HOTAIR axis, weaker). 2 off topic: PMID 41840584 (TCOF1 and the Golgi secretory pathway in renal cancer) and PMID 18079322 (glucocorticoid repression of surfactant protein-A).",
"bound_not_reproducible_as_stored": "NOT REPRODUCIBLE AS STORED, flagged 2026-09-23. This `query` field records a SUMMARY of the search rather than the search: the clause text it names was never written down, so the string cannot be re-run and this bound could not be included in the cycle-71 audit that re-ran 40 of the corpus's other zero-bounds against the live index (all 40 still returned zero). The clauses have deliberately NOT been reconstructed - guessing them would manufacture a query that was never run, which is worse than an abbreviated one because it would look auditable. This flag does not dispute the count or the absence; it records that this particular bound is not independently checkable."
},
{
"query": "(gene clause) AND (nine-term KMT2A/MLL fusion clause)",
"count": 2,
"title_check": "PMIDs 36503469 and 30826414; neither is a localisation measurement.",
"bound_not_reproducible_as_stored": "NOT REPRODUCIBLE AS STORED, flagged 2026-09-23. This `query` field records a SUMMARY of the search rather than the search: the clause text it names was never written down, so the string cannot be re-run and this bound could not be included in the cycle-71 audit that re-ran 40 of the corpus's other zero-bounds against the live index (all 40 still returned zero). The clauses have deliberately NOT been reconstructed - guessing them would manufacture a query that was never run, which is worse than an abbreviated one because it would look auditable. This flag does not dispute the count or the absence; it records that this particular bound is not independently checkable."
},
{
"query": "(gene clause) AND (localisation clause) AND (fusion clause)",
"count": 0,
"role": "the load-bearing zero",
"bound_not_reproducible_as_stored": "NOT REPRODUCIBLE AS STORED, flagged 2026-09-23. This `query` field records a SUMMARY of the search rather than the search: the clause text it names was never written down, so the string cannot be re-run and this bound could not be included in the cycle-71 audit that re-ran 40 of the corpus's other zero-bounds against the live index (all 40 still returned zero). The clauses have deliberately NOT been reconstructed - guessing them would manufacture a query that was never run, which is worse than an abbreviated one because it would look auditable. This flag does not dispute the count or the absence; it records that this particular bound is not independently checkable."
}
],
"complex_form_check_rule_64": "RUN, because brief rule 64's worked example IS this gene: PMID 24054986 knocks down Ikka, Ikkb and Ikkg and is unreachable from any subunit symbol because its abstract frames everything at 'IKK/NF-kB'. This entry's counted absence is therefore stated as a LOCALISATION absence only - the graph already cites that paper via gene-rela, and it contains the ChIP showing IKK/NF-kB signalling is required for retention of wild-type and fusion MLL at target promoters. What is absent is an IKK-ALPHA COMPARTMENT OR OCCUPANCY measurement, not IKK-alpha in this disease.",
"reading": "Titles and abstracts only; supporting figures not searched (brief rule 80).",
"absence_class": "never-measured"
}- Inhibiting IKKa blocks the arm that suppresses this leukaemia at the same time as the arm that supports it. A therapeutic proposal built on 'inhibit IKK' has to say what it expects the non-canonical arm to do and has no data with which to say it.
- IKKa loss impairs skin and immune-organ development in mouse genetics. In an infant, targeting a kinase with developmental roles is a different risk from targeting one in an adult.
- The dependency evidence for this specific subunit is a qualitative comparison inside one screen. That is thin ground for a subunit-level therapeutic claim.
- Which arm dominates when IKKa is lost in an MLL-rearranged cell? A single Ikka knockdown with p100 processing, RelB localisation and an MLL-fusion ChIP read together would answer it.
- Are the anti-leukaemic effects reported for IKK inhibitors III/IV/VII achieved despite non-canonical blockade, or partly because of blocking something else those compounds hit?
- Does IKKa have a chromatin role here independent of NF-kB? IKKa has documented nuclear and histone H3S10-kinase activity in other systems, none of it tested in KMT2A-rearranged leukaemia.
- Would a NIK-arm-sparing IKK inhibitor - IKKb-selective or a degrader - be more effective than the pan compounds used in 2013?
- E1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper
IKKa was among 33 phosphoregulator candidates whose knockdown impaired growth of MLL-oncogene-transformed myeloid progenitors by 50% or more; genetic reduction of Ikka reduced growth and clonogenicity in MLL-oncogene-transduced and MLL AML cells but not in E2A-PBX1-transduced cells or normal haematopoietic progenitors, with Ikka and Ikkg contributing to a lesser extent than Ikkb. The paper describes the canonical pathway as one in which the IKKa/b/g complex phosphorylates IkBa and triggers its degradation, and its pharmacology used non-subunit-selective IKK inhibitors III, IV and VII.
Epigenetic roles of MLL oncoproteins are dependent on NF-κB. · Kuo HP, Wang Z, Lee DF, Iwasaki M, Duque-Afonso J, Wong SHK, Lin CH, Figueroa ME, Su J, Lemischka IR, Cleary ML · Cancer Cell 2013What this evidence cannot show
Mouse myeloid only. The Ikka result is qualitative relative to Ikkb ('to a lesser extent') and no effect size is given in the text. No occupancy, protein-level or non-canonical readout was taken alongside the Ikka knockdown. Full text read this session (PMC3816582).
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The same kinase drives the arm that suppresses this leukaemia. In NIK-stabilised MLL-AF9 cells, increased IKKa phosphorylation accompanies p100-to-p52 processing, RelB upregulation, and delayed leukaemogenesis - so inhibiting IKKa would remove a protective output as well as a permissive one. Xiu Y et al. 2018
- E2established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper
NIK activates non-canonical NF-kB signalling by directly phosphorylating IKKa, which in turn phosphorylates p100 and induces its processing to p52, facilitating formation and nuclear translocation of RelB/p52 complexes. In NIK-stabilised MLL-AF9 leukaemia cells, NIK protein rose about two-fold with increased IKKa phosphorylation, RelB upregulation and activated p100-to-p52 processing, increased nuclear RelB and p52, and markedly reduced RelA expression and nuclear localisation; the net effect was suppression of MLL-AF9-induced AML.
Stabilization of NF-κB-Inducing Kinase Suppresses MLL-AF9-Induced Acute Myeloid Leukemia. · Xiu Y, Dong Q, Li Q, Li F, Borcherding N, Zhang W, Boyce B, Xue HH, Zhao C · Cell Reports 2018What this evidence cannot show
Mouse MLL-AF9 model throughout, using a non-degradable NIK mutant lacking the TRAF3-binding domain rather than a drug. IKKa is measured as a phospho-western readout of NIK activity, not manipulated; no IKKa loss-of-function experiment appears in either paper. Full text read this session via Europe PMC fullTextXML (PMC5810947).
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- That NIK phosphorylates IKKa and drives p100 processing is canonical pathway biology established outside this disease. Its therapeutic direction in MLL-rearranged leukaemia is the opposite of what an IKKa-inhibition rationale would predict: STABILISING NIK, and therefore increasing this very signalling, SUPPRESSES MLL-AF9 AML. Xiu Y et al. 2018
- E3strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.database
Counted absence. (KMT2A OR MLL OR "mixed-lineage leukemia") AND (CHUK OR "IKK-alpha"[tiab] OR "IKKalpha"[tiab] OR "IKK alpha"[tiab]) returns 4 PubMed records; title-checking removes all four (a trained-immunity review, a circRNA network paper in MLL/AF4 ALL, a hybrid grouper nutrition study, and a monozygotic-twin infant ALL concordance study). Title-checked count: 0. CHUK has never been the subject of a KMT2A or MLL paper.
PubMed E-utilities esearch, db=pubmed, run 2026-09-20 · NCBI · PubMed 2026What this evidence cannot show
querytranslation was read; PubMed expanded CHUK to 'chuk protein human' and the IKK-alpha variants to a title/abstract phrase, so the count covers the current symbol and the common spellings. The retired alias IKK1 was not searched separately and could add older records. The founding 2013 paper does not appear in this query because it names IKKa only in its body text, which is itself a reason to distrust a symbol-keyed absence count for a subunit named only inside a figure.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- A zero at the symbol level is not a zero at the pathway level, and on this beat that is demonstrable rather than hypothetical: PMID 29320732 studies the non-canonical arm directly in MLL-AF9 leukaemia and is unreachable from any of these subunit symbol queries, because it names the kinase and the pathway rather than the subunit. The count is honest about what was searched and should not be read as evidence that the biology is unstudied - only that it is not indexed under this symbol. Xiu Y et al. 2018
- E_q93_chuk_loc1established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.database
UniProt O15111 carries Cytoplasm (ECO:0000269 PubMed:12789342, PubMed:30341167) and Nucleus (ECO:0000269 PubMed:12789342) with the note 'Shuttles between the cytoplasm and the nucleus'; both values are experimentally coded, which makes it the best-evidenced compartment record among this graph's three NF-kB kinase and subunit entries.
UniProtKB O15111 (IKKA_HUMAN), SUBCELLULAR LOCATION comment with evidence codes, sources and note, plus TISSUE SPECIFICITY, fetched live 2026-09-21 · UniProt Consortium · Databases 2026What this evidence cannot show
A statement about the record. The ranking claim is comparative within this graph and is exactly what it says: CHUK has two coded values from a paper about its nuclear function; NFKB1's p50 values are coded but rest on a crystal structure; MAP3K14's single value has an empty evidence list. That is a ranking of citation quality, not of how well any of the three compartments is actually quantified - none of the three has a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio reported in a haematopoietic cell.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The second cytoplasmic attribution weakens the record more than the first strengthens it. PubMed:30341167 is 'DDX3 directly facilitates IKKalpha activation and regulates downstream signalling pathways' - an innate-immune signalling study whose subject is a helicase enhancing kinase activation in the TLR7/9 interferon pathway, not where IKK-alpha is. So one of O15111's two cytoplasmic citations is a rule-91 instance of the ordinary kind: a signalling paper cited for a compartment. The annotation survives on its first citation alone. Fullam A et al. 2018
- E_q93_chuk_loc2established confidence 5 of 5: Multiple independent lines of evidence; treated as settled in the field.paper
IKK-alpha functions in the NUCLEUS in a manner independent of its cytoplasmic role in IkappaBalpha phosphorylation: it is recruited to NF-kB-responsive promoters and phosphorylates histone H3 at serine 10, and this nuclear function is critical for cytokine-induced gene expression - the question being raised because IKK-alpha-deficient mouse embryo fibroblasts are defective in NF-kB-dependent transcription while IKK-beta rather than IKK-alpha is the kinase critical for cytokine-induced IkappaB degradation.
Histone H3 phosphorylation by IKK-alpha is critical for cytokine-induced gene expression. · Yamamoto Y, Verma UN, Prajapati S, Kwak YT, Gaynor RB · Nature 2003What this evidence cannot show
Mouse embryo fibroblasts and cytokine-stimulated cell lines, not haematopoietic and not fusion-bearing (brief rule 73). Promoter recruitment measured by chromatin immunoprecipitation is locus OCCUPANCY, which is a genomic address and not a subnuclear compartment - this entry says which it is rather than converting one into the other. Bounded by the abstract.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The relevance of this result to this graph rests on an inference the paper does not make, and it should be stated as an inference. H3S10 phosphorylation recruiting BRD4 and P-TEFb is the mechanism by which a KINASE reaches the same elongation machinery the KMT2A fusion reaches through the SEC - but a shared downstream factor is a shared address, not a shared mechanism, and the same logic was already used and correctly hedged for SGF29 in tranche 4 ('both act at H3K4me3-marked promoters, which is a shared address rather than a shared mechanism'). Nothing here shows IKK-alpha acts at a fusion target locus, and nothing shows the fusion needs it. Thorne JL et al. 2012
- E_q93_chuk_loc3strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper
In ACTIVATED MACROPHAGES, IKK-alpha travels with the ELONGATING form of RNA polymerase II together with heterochromatin protein 1 gamma at NF-kB-dependent genes; IKK-alpha binds and phosphorylates HP1gamma, HP1gamma controls IKK-alpha's binding to chromatin and its phosphorylation of histone variant H3.3 at serine 31 within transcribing regions, and downstream of transcription end sites IKK-alpha accumulates with its inhibitor CUEDC2, which the authors read as linking IKK-alpha inactivation to transcription termination; the same work records that promoter H3 serine-10 phosphorylation by IKK-alpha triggers recruitment of BRD4 and P-TEFb.
Heterochromatin protein 1 gamma and IκB kinase alpha interdependence during tumour necrosis factor gene transcription elongation in activated macrophages. · Thorne JL, Ouboussad L, Lefevre PF · Nucleic Acids Res 2012What this evidence cannot show
Activated macrophages - MYELOID and inflammatory, not lymphoid and not leukaemic (brief rule 73, and the claim names the system first). This is a gene-body occupancy and travelling-complex result, so it is a genomic address along transcription units rather than a subnuclear compartment. The BRD4 and P-TEFb recruitment statement is background in this paper carried from the 2003 work rather than a new measurement here. Bounded by the abstract.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The HP1gamma interdependence cuts against reading this as a clean 'IKK-alpha is an elongation factor' result, and the direction is the interesting part. HP1 proteins are canonical heterochromatin readers, and this paper has one of them travelling with elongating Pol II and CONTROLLING a kinase's chromatin access at active genes - a role opposite to the silencing function the protein is named for. A second, weaker report in liver cancer stem cells also couples IKK subunits to an HP1-HOTAIR axis, so the pairing recurs, but neither paper is in a lymphoid or leukaemic cell and the mechanism has not been reproduced outside inflammatory gene induction. For this graph the honest status is a well-specified hypothesis about a second route to P-TEFb, not an established parallel mechanism. Yamamoto Y et al. 2003
- E_q93_chuk_loc4strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.database
Bounded 2026-09-21: the CHUK gene clause over CHUK, IKKalpha, IKK-alpha and IKK1 returns 3,045 records; against a twelve-term subnuclear clause it returns 4, of which 2 are the HP1gamma papers and 2 are off topic; against a nine-term KMT2A/MLL fusion clause it returns 2, neither a localisation measurement; and against a localisation clause AND the fusion clause it returns 0.
NCBI E-utilities esearch db=pubmed; querytranslation read back and stored beside every count · NCBI E-utilities · Databases 2026What this evidence cannot show
Titles and abstracts only; supporting figures not searched (brief rule 80). The zero is a LOCALISATION absence and not an absence of IKK-alpha in this disease: brief rule 64's own worked example is this gene, where PMID 24054986 knocks down Ikka and is unreachable from the symbol because its abstract frames everything at IKK/NF-kB, and this graph already cites that paper elsewhere.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- Rule 64 was written from this exact gene, so the counted absence here has to carry its own disclaimer, and the disclaimer is load-bearing rather than formal. The complex-level literature contains the single most relevant result available: IKK/NF-kB signalling is required for retention of both wild-type and fusion MLL protein at target promoters with the associated histone modifications, in murine MLL-AF9 and human MLL-rearranged cells - a chromatin-retention phenotype that this graph holds under gene-rela. So IKK activity already has a measured consequence for where the FUSION sits, while IKK-alpha's own position has never been measured. That is the inverse of the usual gap in this beat and it is the more tractable half. Thorne JL et al. 2012
TESTED, NOT REFUTED: 86 free-text co-occurrences, none naming CHUK in title or abstract alongside KMT2A, on the first page examined 2026-09-20.
catalytic alpha subunit; also the NIK substrate of the non-canonical arm
Ikka shRNA reduces growth of MLL-transformed progenitors, to a lesser extent than Ikkb
NIK phosphorylates IKKa to drive p100 processing
the shared component whose dual membership creates the sign problem
Same pathway, opposite compartment problem, and the three NF-kB entries must not disagree: p50's nucleus rests on a crystal structure (well-founded biology, wrong instrument cited), IKK-alpha's nucleus rests on a real chromatin paper (PMID 12789342), and NIK's cytoplasm rests on nothing at all (Q89). Ranked by evidence quality that is CHUK > NFKB1 > MAP3K14 (Q93 2026-09-21)
IKK-alpha TRAVELS WITH ELONGATING POL II together with HP1gamma at NF-kB-dependent genes in activated macrophages, phosphorylating H3.3S31 within transcribing regions, and accumulates with its inhibitor CUEDC2 downstream of transcription end sites (PMID 22649058). A genomic address with a coordinate along the gene, not a nuclear body (Q93 2026-09-21)
A SECOND, KINASE-DRIVEN ROUTE TO THE SAME FACTORS. IKK-alpha phosphorylates H3 serine 10 at NF-kB-responsive promoters and that mark triggers recruitment of BRD4 and P-TEFb (PMIDs 12789342, 22649058) - the two factors the KMT2A fusion reaches through the SEC. Nobody has put IKK-alpha and a KMT2A fusion in the same chromatin readout (Q93 2026-09-21)
H3S10ph written by IKK-alpha recruits P-TEFb at induced promoters (PMID 12789342), which is an NF-kB-pathway route to the elongation machinery independent of the AFF1/AFF4 scaffold this graph is built on. Shown in fibroblasts and macrophages; never tested in a fusion cell (Q93 2026-09-21)
The two-arm membership has a compartment consequence the graph should not blur: NIK's own cytoplasmic call is UNSOURCED and the nuclear step of the noncanonical arm belongs to RelB:p52, not to NIK (Q89) - whereas IKK-alpha genuinely shuttles, with a coded citation that is about its nuclear function (PMID 12789342) (Q93 2026-09-21)
IKK activity already has a measured consequence for where the FUSION sits - IKK/NF-kB signalling is required for retention of wild-type and fusion MLL at target promoters - while IKK-alpha's own chromatin position has never been measured in a leukaemic cell. The inverse of this beat's usual gap (Q93 2026-09-21)