KRAS as a co-mutation in KMT2A-r leukemia — the single most frequently co-mutated gene, and it still cannot start the disease
also called KRAS in MLL-rearranged ALL · K-RAS co-lesion · KRAS G12/G13 infant ALL
KRAS is the gene most often broken alongside a KMT2A fusion — roughly one in five to one in four infant cases. But experiments show that adding a broken KRAS to a KMT2A fusion in human blood stem cells does not create leukemia; it makes the cells travel further, including into the brain and spinal fluid.
The same thing, for a scientist
KRAS is the most frequently co-mutated single gene in KMT2A-rearranged leukemia. It was the only recurrent gene beyond KMT2A itself in the St. Jude PCGP whole-genome discovery cohort (n = 4 of 22), and together with NRAS it accounted for all recurrent mutations in the 124-patient Interfant-99/06 cohort (34-38% of cases for KRAS plus NRAS combined). Hotspots are canonical: G12, G13, Q61, plus the atypical A146T and K117N. Functionally it is not an initiating second hit — KRAS-G12V plus KMT2A::AFF1 fails to immortalise or transform human cord-blood CD34+ HSPCs and fails to initiate leukemia in xenografts, instead driving extramedullary engraftment, leukocytosis and CNS infiltration via a migration gene signature. A curiosity with mechanistic weight: in one PCGP case the KRAS locus was itself involved in the rearrangement, producing an in-frame reciprocal KRAS-MLL fusion protein.
Frequency and hotspots1 deeper
Discovery. In the 22-case whole-genome PCGP infant KMT2A-r ALL cohort, KRAS was the most frequently mutated gene after KMT2A itself, with n = 4 recurrent mutations — ahead of NRAS (n = 2), with FLT3, NF1, PTPN11 and PIK3R1 each appearing once 1.
Independent replication. In 124 infant B-ALL cases from Interfant-99/06, recurrent mutations were found exclusively in KRAS and NRAS: 38% of the 42-case discovery arm and 34% of the 82-case validation arm carried an activating mutation in one of the two 2. Unlike NRAS, KRAS was not reported as enriched in t(4;11) specifically; the t(4;11) enrichment in that cohort was an NRAS effect (32% vs 6%, P = 0.01) 2. See comut-nras-kmt2a-r.
Variant spectrum. Querying the public curation of the PCGP study (cBioPortal all_stjude_2015, 93 sequenced samples, retrieved 2026-09-18) returns 14 KRAS mutations across 12 samples, with the following distinct protein changes 3:
| variant | class |
|---|---|
| G12D, G12R, G12S, G12V | canonical codon 12 |
| G13D | canonical codon 13 |
| Q61H | canonical codon 61 |
| A146T | atypical, C-terminal switch-III / nucleotide-exchange |
| K117N | atypical, GTP-binding, intrinsic-hydrolysis-impairing |
The presence of A146T and K117N matters practically: these are weaker, non-canonical activating alleles that hotspot-only panels covering codons 12/13/61 will miss, and they are also the alleles least well covered by the emerging KRAS-selective inhibitors. Note that 14 mutations across 12 samples means at least two samples carried more than one KRAS allele — consistent with the parallel subclonal architecture described in comut-ras-pathway-kmt2a-r.
The denominator warning
The 12/93 cBioPortal figure must not be quoted as a KMT2A-r frequency. The 93 samples in that study mix infant KMT2A-r, infant non-KMT2A-r, non-infant KMT2A-r and relapse specimens 3. It is a variant-spectrum resource, not a frequency estimate. The defensible frequency statements are the ones with clean denominators: n = 4 of 22 whole-genome infant KMT2A-r cases 1, and KRAS-plus-NRAS in 34-38% of 124 Interfant infants 2. In the non-infant KMT2A-r group (n = 20, ages 7-19) KRAS was recurrent at n = 3, alongside NRAS (n = 3) and FLT3 (n = 3) 1.
Functional verdict: a dissemination gene, not an initiation gene
The decisive experiment transduced human cord-blood CD34+ HSPCs with KMT2A::AFF1, KRAS-G12V, or both, and transplanted them intra-bone-marrow into immunodeficient mice 4.
- KRAS activation did not cooperate with KMT2A::AFF1 to immortalise CD34+ HSPCs in clonogenic or differentiation/proliferation assays.
- KMT2A::AFF1 alone, KRAS-G12V alone, and the combination all enhanced haematopoietic repopulation without impairing myeloid-lymphoid differentiation and without initiating leukemia.
- KRAS activation did enhance extramedullary haematopoiesis of KMT2A::AFF1-expressing lines and HSPCs, with leukocytosis and CNS infiltration — both clinical hallmarks of infant t(4;11) B-ALL — and transcriptional profiling of KMT2A::AFF1 patient samples supported a cell-migration gene signature underlying the mutant-KRAS phenotype 4.
The clinical genetics agrees on every point where it can be checked: RAS-mutant infants present with higher white-cell counts (P = 0.013) 5, the mutations are largely subclonal and arrive after the fusion 1, and NG2-high KMT2A-r infant blasts — a separate migration-associated marker — likewise associate with more circulating blasts and more frequent CNS disease and relapse 6. The consistent picture is that KRAS in this disease buys spread, not transformation.
The reciprocal KRAS-MLL fusion — a genuinely strange observation
In the PCGP cohort, of the 22 whole-genome cases only 10 were predicted to encode an in-frame reciprocal partner-gene fusion protein, and two of those involved genes with a known role in cancer. One of the two was KRAS-MLL 1. The public structural-variant curation of the same study independently contains a KRAS::KMT2A record 3.
So in at least one infant, the KRAS locus was not point-mutated but physically incorporated into the KMT2A rearrangement as the 5' partner of a reciprocal derivative product. Whether that product is expressed, stable, or functional is unknown and untested. It is included here because it is a reminder that co-lesion analysis restricted to point mutations will systematically miss structural involvement of the same genes. See cnv-reciprocal-derivative-chromosome-retention.
Therapeutic reading
KRAS is the co-mutation most people reach for first because it is the most frequent and, since 2021, the most druggable RAS isoform. Three things argue against optimism in this specific disease.
- The alleles are wrong for the available drugs. The approved and advanced KRAS-selective inhibitors target G12C (sotorasib, adagrasib) and G12D. In the observed spectrum, G12C does not appear at all in the KRAS variant list for this cohort (it appears in NRAS), and the spectrum is dominated by G12D/G12R/G12S/G12V, G13D, Q61H plus the atypical A146T and K117N 3. Pan-KRAS and G12D-selective agents would be required, none of which has infant pharmacology.
- The clone is usually a minority and is often lost at relapse — two of five informative PCGP diagnosis-relapse pairs lost the pathway mutation, and two thirds of relapsing Interfant patients lost the diagnostic RAS mutation 1, 2.
- The functional data say it is not load-bearing. A gene that cannot initiate and is not required for maintenance is a poor drug target even when frequent 4.
The more defensible route through KRAS in this disease is downstream and genotype-agnostic: MEK inhibition, which sensitises KMT2A-r blasts to prednisolone in both RAS-mutant and RAS-wild-type cells. That argument is developed in comut-ras-pathway-kmt2a-r.
| gene symbol | KRAS |
|---|---|
| hgnc ID | HGNC:6407 |
| entrez gene ID | 3845 |
| uniprot | P01116 |
| cytoband | 12p12.1 |
| pathway | RAS-MAPK |
| role in kmt2a r | most frequent single co-mutated gene; dissemination/maintenance rather than initiation |
| druggability note | G12C absent from the observed KRAS spectrum in this cohort; spectrum dominated by G12D/G12R/G12S/G12V, G13D, Q61H plus A146T and K117N. Sotorasib/adagrasib (G12C-selective) are therefore not applicable; pan-KRAS or G12D-selective agents would be required and have no infant pharmacology. |
| genome build note | No coordinates asserted. Protein changes are given in HGVS p. notation against the canonical KRAS transcript as curated by cBioPortal; the source analysis aligned to GRCh37-lite (NCBI build 37). |
frequency
{
"pcgp_infant_wgs_discovery": {
"n_mutated": 4,
"n_cohort": 22,
"pmid": "25730765",
"title": "The landscape of somatic mutations in infant MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemias.",
"authors": "Andersson AK, Ma J, Wang J, et al.",
"venue": "Nat Genet",
"year": 2015,
"title_provenance": "Title/authors/venue backfilled from PubMed esummary on 2026-09-20 because this citation stored a bare PMID with no title, which made it unscoreable by verify-citations.py. BACKFILLING IS NOT VERIFICATION: it confirms the PMID resolves to a real paper, not that this is the right paper for the claim. That still requires reading."
},
"pcgp_non_infant_kmt2a_r": {
"n_mutated": 3,
"n_cohort": 20,
"pmid": "25730765",
"title": "The landscape of somatic mutations in infant MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemias.",
"authors": "Andersson AK, Ma J, Wang J, et al.",
"venue": "Nat Genet",
"year": 2015,
"title_provenance": "Title/authors/venue backfilled from PubMed esummary on 2026-09-20 because this citation stored a bare PMID with no title, which made it unscoreable by verify-citations.py. BACKFILLING IS NOT VERIFICATION: it confirms the PMID resolves to a real paper, not that this is the right paper for the claim. That still requires reading."
},
"interfant_99_06_kras_plus_nras_discovery_pct": 38,
"interfant_99_06_kras_plus_nras_validation_pct": 34,
"isolated_kras_frequency": "not separately reported in the Interfant cohort"
}variant spectrum cbioportal all stjude 2015
{
"n_mutations": 14,
"n_samples_with_mutation": 12,
"n_samples_sequenced": 93,
"denominator_warning": "mixed infant/non-infant, KMT2A-r and non-KMT2A-r, diagnosis and relapse; not a KMT2A-r frequency",
"canonical_hotspots": [
"G12D",
"G12R",
"G12S",
"G12V",
"G13D",
"Q61H"
],
"atypical_alleles": [
"A146T",
"K117N"
],
"retrieved": "2026-09-18"
}structural involvement
{
"reciprocal_fusion_predicted": "KRAS-MLL (in-frame reciprocal product, 1 PCGP case)",
"cbioportal_sv_record": "KRAS::KMT2A",
"expression_or_function": "unknown, untested"
}- Resistance: the observed KRAS allele spectrum excludes G12C, so the one class of KRAS-selective inhibitor with mature clinical data is inapplicable; any pan-KRAS agent would face the standard RTK-feedback reactivation problem in cells that already over-express FLT3.
- Futility: KRAS mutation is subclonal in most cases and lost at relapse in a substantial fraction, so a KRAS-directed drug may clear a clone irrelevant to the eventual relapse.
- Essential-function toxicity: KRAS is required in normal haematopoiesis and development; systemic pan-KRAS inhibition in an infant under one year of age is an untested and non-trivial developmental risk.
- Delivery: the phenotype KRAS drives in this disease is CNS infiltration, which is the compartment most small molecules reach least well. A drug that works in marrow and not in the CNS would fail against precisely the phenotype the mutation causes.
- Is the KRAS-MLL reciprocal fusion product actually expressed and functional in the one case where it was predicted? If a RAS gene can be captured as a reciprocal fusion partner, that is a mechanistically distinct second hit that no point-mutation survey would detect.
- Do the atypical KRAS alleles A146T and K117N behave differently from codon-12/13 alleles in this disease? They are weaker activators and are systematically missed by hotspot panels, so both their true frequency and their phenotype in KMT2A-r blasts are unknown.
- Is mutant KRAS necessary for CNS infiltration, or only sufficient to enhance it? The published experiment adds KRAS; nobody has removed it from a KRAS-mutant KMT2A-r patient-derived xenograft and asked whether CNS tropism is lost.
- Does KRAS mutant allele frequency at diagnosis predict CNS disease or relapse site? The migration phenotype makes this a specific, testable clinical prediction that existing Interfant material could answer.
- E1strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper
KRAS was the most frequently recurrently mutated gene besides KMT2A in the 22-case whole-genome PCGP infant KMT2A-r ALL discovery cohort (n = 4), was recurrent at n = 3 in the 20-case non-infant KMT2A-r cohort, and the KRAS locus was involved in one of two in-frame reciprocal fusion products of known cancer genes (KRAS-MLL).
The landscape of somatic mutations in infant MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemias · Andersson AK, Ma J, Wang J, Chen X, Gedman AL, Dang J, et al. · Nature Genetics 47(4):330-7 2015What this evidence cannot show
n = 4 of 22 is four events; the ranking of KRAS above NRAS rests on a two-case difference and should not be treated as a stable ordering. The validation cohort was sequenced across only 232 preselected genes. The KRAS-MLL reciprocal product is a prediction from breakpoint structure in a single case, with no reported evidence of expression or function.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- Four of 22 makes KRAS the most frequent recurrent gene in that cohort and does not make it frequent: the 95% interval runs from about 5% to 40%. "Most frequently mutated besides KMT2A" is a within-cohort ordering among very small counts, and the KRAS-KMT2A fusion product is a single case. Blood 2014
- E2strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper
In 124 infant B-ALL cases from Interfant-99/06, recurrent mutations were found exclusively in KRAS and NRAS, present in 38% of the 42-case discovery cohort and 34% of the 82-case validation cohort; the mutations were subclonal and two thirds of relapsing patients lost the diagnostic RAS mutation.
Unraveling the cellular origin and clinical prognostic markers of infant B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia using genome-wide analysis · Agraz-Doblas A, Bueno C, Bashford-Rogers R, Roy A, Schneider P, Bardini M, et al. · Haematologica 104(6):1176-1188 2019What this evidence cannot show
The 34-38% figures are KRAS and NRAS combined; the paper's abstract does not split them, so no isolated KRAS frequency can be quoted from this cohort. Discovery and validation arms used different assays.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The entry's own numbers argue against KRAS as a therapeutic co-lesion: the mutations are SUBCLONAL and two thirds of relapsing patients LOSE the diagnostic RAS mutation. A lesion that the relapse clone discards is not what the relapse depends on, whatever its frequency at diagnosis. Leukemia 2021
- E3moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.database
The public curation of the PCGP study contains 14 KRAS mutations across 12 of 93 sequenced samples, with protein changes G12D, G12R, G12S, G12V, G13D, Q61H, A146T and K117N, and a KRAS::KMT2A structural-variant record.
cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics, study all_stjude_2015 (Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, St Jude, Nat Genet 2015) — KRAS mutation and structural-variant records retrieved via the public REST API on 2026-09-18 · cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics · Database 2026What this evidence cannot show
The 93 samples mix infant KMT2A-r, infant non-KMT2A-r, non-infant KMT2A-r and relapse specimens, so 12/93 is NOT a KMT2A-r frequency and must not be quoted as one. Variant lists are deduplicated protein changes, not per-sample genotypes; allele frequencies were not retrieved. Curation filters differ from the paper's own tiering.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- A public curation of one study is not an independent line of evidence for that study's finding. The 93 sequenced samples are the PCGP cohort, so counting mutations in the portal re-reports the same patients through a different interface, and structural-variant records in such curations inherit the original calling pipeline rather than testing it. Ensembl, EMBL-EBI 2026
- E4strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper
KRAS-G12V does not cooperate with KMT2A::AFF1 to immortalise human cord-blood CD34+ HSPCs or to initiate leukemia in immunodeficient mice; it enhances extramedullary engraftment, leukocytosis and CNS infiltration, supported by a cell-migration gene signature in KMT2A::AFF1 patient samples, indicating a role in maintenance and dissemination rather than initiation.
Activated KRAS Cooperates with MLL-AF4 to Promote Extramedullary Engraftment and Migration of Cord Blood CD34+ HSPC But Is Insufficient to Initiate Leukemia · Prieto C, Stam RW, Agraz-Doblas A, Ballerini P, Camos M, Castaño J, Marschalek R, Bursen A, Varela I, Bueno C, Menendez P · Cancer Research 76(8):2478-89 2016What this evidence cannot show
A negative transformation result in a system that has never successfully modelled KMT2A::AFF1 B-ALL even with the fusion alone, so the failure may be the model's rather than the biology's. Single KRAS allele (G12V), retroviral over-expression, cord blood rather than fetal liver as the cell of origin.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- A negative in human cord-blood CD34+ cells and immunodeficient mice is a statement about that model system. The cell of origin for infant KMT2A-r ALL is a fetal progenitor, not a cord-blood CD34+ cell, and an immunodeficient xenograft removes the immune selection that operates on a subclonal RAS lesion in a patient. The finding is compatible with KRAS-G12V being a real initiating cooperator in the right cell. Leukemia 2021
- E5strong confidence 4 of 5: Replicated in peer-reviewed work by more than one group.paper
RAS-mutated infant ALL patients present with significantly higher white blood cell counts at diagnosis (P = 0.013) and their blasts are more resistant to glucocorticoids in vitro (P < 0.05); RAS mutations were found in ~24% of t(4;11)-positive infants and were an independent predictor of poor outcome (HR 3.194, 95% CI 1.211-8.429, P = 0.019).
Frequencies and prognostic impact of RAS mutations in MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants · Driessen EMC, van Roon EHJ, Spijkers-Hagelstein JAP, Schneider P, de Lorenzo P, Valsecchi MG, Pieters R, Stam RW · Haematologica 98(6):937-44 2013What this evidence cannot show
Screened NRAS, KRAS and BRAF together by Sanger sequencing, so the clinical associations are pooled across genes and cannot be attributed to KRAS specifically. Sanger under-detects subclones.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- The PCGP cohort found only a non-significant trend toward poorer EFS/OS for kinase/PI3K/RAS pathway mutations, not an independent adverse effect. Andersson AK et al. 2015
- E6moderate confidence 3 of 5: One strong study, or several smaller consistent ones.paper
In the Interfant cohort of KMT2A-r infant B-ALL, high NG2 expression associates with lower event-free survival, a higher number of circulating blasts and more frequent CNS disease and relapse, and NG2 is markedly upregulated in blasts infiltrating extramedullary sites and the CNS, with a migratory gene-expression signature.
NG2 antigen is involved in leukemia invasiveness and central nervous system infiltration in MLL-rearranged infant B-ALL · Prieto C, López-Millán B, Roca-Ho H, Stam RW, Romero-Moya D, Rodríguez-Baena FJ, et al. · Leukemia 32(3):633-644 2018What this evidence cannot show
Cited only as convergent support that dissemination and CNS tropism are separable, marker-associated properties of KMT2A-r blasts. This paper does not examine KRAS genotype, so the link between KRAS mutation and NG2-driven migration is an inference, not a demonstrated connection.
Evidence that argues against this (1)
- NG2 is an association with outcome, measured in patients who were not randomised on it, and high NG2 tracks with circulating blast count — which is itself one of the strongest established prognostic variables in infant ALL. The independent contribution of NG2 over blast count is not established by the correlation reported here. Leukemia 2021
gene-level dossier for the co-mutation entry: accession, clonality, sufficiency
- co-occurs with →KMT2A::AFF1 (MLL-AF4), t(4;11)(q21;q23)
the single most frequent co-mutation